Jones Law Firm, P.C., New York (Elaine Platt of counsel), for appellants.

Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, New York (Michael S. Devorkin of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered April 4, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Omar Belmamoun's motion for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1) (a), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Relying on Civil Rights Law § 76-a (1) (d), plaintiffs contend that their lawsuit concerns a purely private matter; therefore, the court should not have awarded attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1) (a). This argument is unavailing. While Civil Rights Law § 76-a (1) (a) (1) requires a "communication . . . in connection with an issue of public interest," subsection (2) does not require public interest and "conduct . . . in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition" suffices. "[T]he right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government" includes litigation (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 37 NY3d 1088 [2021]). Additionally, "[m]atters of public interest also include judicial proceedings" (Reeves v Associated Newspapers, Ltd., 232 AD3d 10, 19 [1st Dept, Aug. 22, 2024]).

Plaintiffs' contention that any fee award should go to nonparty Brookstone Partners Morocco, S.A. rather than Belmamoun, is unavailing. Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1) (a) states, "A defendant in an action involving public petition and participation . . . may maintain an action, claim, cross claim or counterclaim to recover . . . costs and attorney's fees." Here, plaintiffs sued Belmamoun individually and he incurred legal fees.

Plaintiffs' claim that former defendant Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP is ineligible for a SLAPP award is not reviewable on this appeal. Plaintiffs appealed from an order that granted Belmamoun's motion to dismiss and for attorneys' fees, rather than from an order granting a motion by Golenbock for attorneys' fees. Concur—Kern, J.P., Oing, Kapnick, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.