| Applehole v Wyeth Ayerst Labs. |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 01059 [213 AD3d 611] |
| February 28, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Clara Applehole et al., Appellants, v Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Paul Napoli et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.) |
Parker Waichman LLP, Port Washington (Jay L. T. Breakstone of counsel), for appellants.
L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Melville (Marian C. Rice of counsel), and Groombridge, Wu, Baughman and Stone, LLP, New York (Eric Alan Stone of counsel), for Paul J. Napoli and others, respondents.
Ropers Majeski, P.C., New York (John W. Hanson of counsel), for Marc J. Bern and another, respondents.
Godosky & Gentile, P.C., New York (Anthony Gentile of counsel), for Gerald Kaiser, respondents.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered January 31, 2022, which granted the motion of defendants Paul J. Napoli, Gerald Kaiser, Marc J. Bern, Napoli, Kaiser & Associates LLP, Napoli, Kaiser, Bern LLP, Napoli, Kaiser, Bern & Associates LLP, Law Offices of Marc Jay Bern, P.C., Napoli, Kaiser, Bern & Associates P.C., and Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, P.C. to disqualify Parker Waichman LLP or any of its related entities from representing intervenor plaintiffs in this action, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
Plaintiffs have already appealed a prior order determining that Parker Waichman was disqualified under Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 3.7 (b) from representing intervenor plaintiffs in this action, as a partner of that firm was to be called as a material witness. This Court affirmed the order, and both this Court and the Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal (see Matter of Diet Drug Litig., 180 AD3d 483, 483 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 942 [2020]). As a result, since there has been no new evidence discovered after the prior order or any change in the applicable law, resolution of the issue on the prior appeal constitutes the law of the case and forecloses reexamination of the issue (see Kenney v City of New York, 74 AD3d 630, 630-631 [1st Dept 2010]). As Parker Waichman was disqualified from representing plaintiffs in any capacity, it does not have standing to bring the appeal and therefore, the appeal must be dismissed. Concur—Kern, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, JJ.