| Brioso v City of Buffalo |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 06381 [210 AD3d 1443] |
| November 10, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Raquel Brioso, Appellant, v City of Buffalo et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 2.) |
Hagerty & Brady, Buffalo (Daniel J. Brady of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Nash Connors, P.C., Buffalo (Bethany Rubin of counsel), for defendants-respondents Erie Canal Harbor Development Corp. and others.
Barclay Damon LLP, Buffalo (Vincent G. Saccomando of counsel), for defendant-respondent Pinto Construction Services, Inc.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mark A. Montour, J.), entered April 19, 2022. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants City of Buffalo, Erie Canal Harbor Development Corp., LeChase Construction Services, LLC, and Be Our Guest, Ltd., for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, granted in part the cross motion of those defendants for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Curran and Winslow, JJ.