People v Seay
2022 NY Slip Op 00601 [201 AD3d 1361]
January 28, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 9, 2022


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
David Seay, Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert L. Kemp of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

John J. Flynn, District Attorney, Buffalo (Michael J. Hillery of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered February 6, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [v]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Alls, 187 AD3d 1515, 1515 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

We note, however, that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 31/3 to 4 years, and it must be amended to reflect that he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 11/3 to 4 years (see People v Massey, 173 AD3d 1801, 1805 [4th Dept 2019]). Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni and Bannister, JJ.