| Atlantic Radiology Imaging, P.C. v Esurance Ins. Co. |
| 2016 NY Slip Op 50315(U) [50 Misc 3d 147(A)] |
| Decided on March 11, 2016 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Dawn Jimenez Salta, J.), entered August 1, 2012. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).
Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the affidavit of defendant's employee was sufficient to establish the mailing of the EUO scheduling letters (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).
Plaintiff also argues that the affirmation by the managing partner of defendant's law firm, which had been retained to conduct the EUOs, did not establish that the assignor had failed to appear for the EUOs. This argument lacks merit, as that affirmation was not the proof submitted by defendant to establish the assignor's failure to appear.
As plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any basis to disturb the Civil Court's order, the order is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.