Desario v SL Green Mgt. LLC
2014 NY Slip Op 04256 [118 AD3d 520]
June 12, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 30, 2014


[*1]
 Frank Desario, Respondent,
v
SL Green Management LLC et al., Appellants.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellants.

Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro & Halperin, LLP, New York (David M. Schwarz of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered December 23, 2013, which granted plaintiff's motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum served upon his former employers and for a protective order precluding defendants from using any of the information obtained by the subpoenas at trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in quashing defendants' post note of issue trial subpoenas seeking plaintiff's entire employment files from three employers. Defendants failed to demonstrate "unusual or unanticipated" circumstances or "substantial prejudice" sufficient to warrant post-note of issue discovery (see Schroeder v IESI NY Corp., 24 AD3d 180 [1st Dept 2005]; 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Concur—Acosta, J.P., DeGrasse, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.