| People v Rodriguez |
| 2013 NY Slip Op 05719 [21 NY3d 1030] |
| August 27, 2013 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, October 16, 2013 |
| The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant. |
Decided August 27, 2013
People v Rodriguez, 102 AD3d 457, affirmed.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Lisa A. Packard of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Patricia Curran of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days' notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument{**21 NY3d at 1032} that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is [*2]similarly unreviewable.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.