Matter of Toro v Evans |
2012 NY Slip Op 04049 [95 AD3d 1573] |
May 24, 2012 |
Appellate Division, Third Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
2—In the Matter of Angelo Toro, Appellant, v Andrea W. Evans, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent. |
—[*1]
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marlene O. Tuczinski of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Gilpatric, J.), entered August 4, 2011 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a December 2010 determination of the Board of Parole, which denied his request for parole release. Citing the fact that petitioner's administrative appeal of that denial was still pending at the time this proceeding was commenced, respondent moved to dismiss based upon petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.[FN*] Supreme Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition. Petitioner appeals and we affirm. Contrary to petitioner's argument, the record does not support his conclusory contention that exhaustion was not required because further pursuit of an administrative appeal would have been futile (see People ex rel. Martinez v Beaver, 8 AD3d [*2]1095 [2004]; People ex rel. Gaito v Couture, 268 AD2d 914 [2000], lv denied 94 NY2d 765 [2000]). Nor has he demonstrated the applicability of any other recognized exception to the exhaustion requirement.
Rose, J.P., Malone Jr., Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.