People v Mondo |
2011 NY Slip Op 07019 [88 AD3d 676] |
October 4, 2011 |
Appellate Division, Second Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v Anthony Mondo, Appellant. |
—[*1]
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marcia R. Kucera of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated September 7, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
"A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where 'there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines' " (People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920, 920-921 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011], quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Alston, 86 AD3d 553, 554 [2011]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender (see People v Padro, 84 AD3d 1046 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 711 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Eng, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.