Melnick v Khoroushi
2008 NY Slip Op 10206 [57 AD3d 414]
December 30, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 11, 2009


Stuart L. Melnick et al., Appellants,
v
Fred Khoroushi et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[*1] Law Offices of Stuart L. Melnick, LLC, New York (Stuart L. Melnick of counsel), appellants pro se.

Friedman, Harfenist, Kraut & Perlstein LLP, Lake Success (Steven J. Harfenist of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered June 18, 2008, which denied plaintiffs' motion to vacate a default judgment that had affirmed an arbitration award directing plaintiffs to refund $12,000 in legal fees to defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Sanction for frivolous prosecution of this appeal (22 NYCRR 130-1.1) imposed on plaintiffs for $3,500. The Clerk of Supreme Court, New York County directed to enter judgment payable in that amount to Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, and the matter remanded for determination of reasonable attorney fees incurred in responding to this appeal, to be payable by plaintiffs to defendants Khoroushi and Alpine Armoring.

A default is considered intentional when a party takes no steps to vacate it until after judgment has been entered against him (see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]). Despite having been afforded ample opportunity to avoid the entry of default judgment, plaintiffs failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious defense to the counterclaims asserted by defendants (see Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v Farber, 34 AD3d 230 [2006]).

Under the circumstances, this appeal is frivolous. Sanctions should be imposed, and the responding defendants should be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred on this appeal (see Tsabbar v Auld, 26 AD3d 233 [2006]). [*2]

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Nardelli, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.