Matter of Kelly v Selsky
2008 NY Slip Op 04580 [51 AD3d 1298]
May 22, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 16, 2008


In the Matter of Courtney Kelly, Appellant,
v
Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[*1] Courtney Kelly, Pine City, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Egan, J.), entered August 23, 2007 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of assaulting another inmate, engaging in violent conduct and creating a disturbance. Petitioner thereafter administratively appealed the determination of guilt. While his administrative appeal was still pending, petitioner initiated this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking judicial review of the disciplinary determination. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition, Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. This proceeding was prematurely commenced inasmuch as it was filed before a final determination was issued in connection with petitioner's administrative appeal (see Matter of Dagnone v Goord, 298 AD2d 789, 790 [2002]). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition based upon petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies (see id.).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.