People v Foy
2008 NY Slip Op 02807 [49 AD3d 835]
March 25, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 14, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Perry Foy, Appellant.

[*1] Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, N.Y. (David B. Weisfuse of counsel), for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Lois Cullen Valerio, Richard Longworth Hecht, and Anthony J. Servino of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered May 7, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"Utilization of the risk assessment instrument will generally result in the proper classification in most cases so that departures will be the exception not the rule . . . A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines" (People v O'Neal, 26 AD3d 365, 365 [2006]). There must be clear and convincing evidence of the existence of a special circumstance to warrant a departure (see People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403 [2005]).

Here, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the request for a downward departure based upon the defendant's contention that his conviction was for statutory rape, as opposed to forcible rape. This factor was already taken into account in the risk assessment instrument, as indicated by the failure to assess points therein for the use of force (see People v Walker, 47 AD3d 692 [2008]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Florio and Chambers, JJ., concur.