Hoang v Man Chong Wong
2008 NY Slip Op 02555 [49 AD3d 694]
March 18, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 14, 2008


Kevin Hoang et al., Appellants,
v
Man Chong Wong, Respondent.

[*1] Lester B. Herzog, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.

Connors & Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Michael J. Caulfield, Zena Woldeyesus, and David S. Heller of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 22, 2007, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The failure of the defendant landlord to provide heat and hot water to the plaintiffs' apartment was not a proximate cause of the personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. While the defendant's conduct gave rise to the plaintiff mother's attempt to provide a substitute supply of hot water so that the infant plaintiff could bathe, the intervening act of the mother and the son walking into each other while the mother sought to transport a pot of boiled water into the bathroom brought about the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. Those injuries would not have resulted from the failure to supply hot water alone, and cannot be classified as injuries normally to have been expected to ensue from the defendant landlord's conduct (see Martinez v Lazaroff, 48 NY2d 819, 820 [1979]; Barragan v Mathai, 253 AD2d 508, 509 [1998]; Laureano v Louzoun, 165 AD2d 866 [1990]; see also Wells v Finnegan, 177 AD2d 893, 894 [1991]). In opposition to the defendant establishing his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ., concur.