Matter of Casselman v Village of Lowville |
2003 NY Slip Op 20061 [2 AD3d 1281] |
December 31, 2003 |
Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
As corrected through |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
In the Matter of David Casselman, Respondent, v Village of Lowville, Appellant. |
—
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Gilbert, J.), entered December 19, 2002, which granted the petition and annulled the determination denying petitioner's application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination to deny his application for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c on the ground that petitioner's injury was not "incurred in the performance of special work related to the nature of heightened risks and duties" of police work (Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, 259 [1999]). Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination. "[I]n order to be eligible for section 207-c benefits, a covered municipal employee need only prove a 'direct causal relationship between job duties and the resulting illness or injury' " (Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 243-244 [2003]). Petitioner proved such a direct causal relationship and thus demonstrated his entitlement to benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c. Present—Green, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.