| People v Capuli (Anselmo) |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 51535(U) [84 Misc 3d 128(A)] |
| Decided on September 27, 2024 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appellate Advocates (Elisabeth R. Calcaterra of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Thomas B. Litsky and Timothy Pezzoli of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Biju J. Koshy, J.), rendered June 16, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]).
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
BUGGS, J.P., TOUSSAINT and MUNDY, JJ., concur.
ENTER: