| Matter of Burgos v Citywide Cent. Ins. Program |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 08041 [30 NY3d 990] |
| November 16, 2017 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, December 27, 2017 |
| In the Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos, Appellant, v Citywide Central Insurance Program et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. |
Decided November 16, 2017
Matter of Burgos v Citywide Cent. Ins. Program, 148 AD3d 1493, affirmed.
Law Offices of Michael D. Uysal, PLLC, New York City (Michael D. Uysal of counsel), for appellant.
Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, P.C., New York City (J. Evan Perigoe of counsel), for Citywide Central Insurance Program and another, respondents.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Laura Etlinger, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly concluded{**30 NY3d at 991} that substantial evidence supports the Workers' Compensation Board's determinations as to the claimant's degree of impairment and loss of wage-earning capacity (see generally Matter of Zamora v New York Neurologic Assoc., 19 NY3d 186, 192-193 [2012]).
Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman.