People v Romero
2012 NY Slip Op 08786 [101 AD3d 560]
December 20, 2012
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 6, 2013


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Cesar Romero, Appellant.

[*1] Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York (Douglas S. Zolkind of counsel), and Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Alan Axelrod of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), and Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York (James L. Kerwin of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel Conviser, J.), rendered October 5, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Defendant's criminal intent could be readily inferred from the surrounding circumstances (see generally People v Mackey, 49 NY2d 274, 278-279 [1980]). Defendant's presence in a walk-in closet inside an apartment in the early morning hours, with his hands above his head near a jewelry box, provided ample evidence that defendant entered the apartment with intent to commit a crime therein. The jury properly rejected the implausible explanation that defendant offered for his actions (see e.g. People v Jenkins, 213 AD2d 279 [1st Dept 1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 974 [1995]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.