People v Romero |
2012 NY Slip Op 08786 [101 AD3d 560] |
December 20, 2012 |
Appellate Division, First Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cesar Romero, Appellant. |
—[*1]
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), and
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York (James L. Kerwin of counsel), for
respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel Conviser, J.), rendered October 5, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Defendant's criminal intent could be readily inferred from the surrounding circumstances (see generally People v Mackey, 49 NY2d 274, 278-279 [1980]). Defendant's presence in a walk-in closet inside an apartment in the early morning hours, with his hands above his head near a jewelry box, provided ample evidence that defendant entered the apartment with intent to commit a crime therein. The jury properly rejected the implausible explanation that defendant offered for his actions (see e.g. People v Jenkins, 213 AD2d 279 [1st Dept 1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 974 [1995]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.