People v Martin
2009 NY Slip Op 00245 [58 AD3d 519]
January 20, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 11, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Elvis Martin, Appellant.

[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Mary Jo L. Blanchard of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), rendered November 1, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

When the court ordered a joint trial over defendant's objection, and permitted the People to introduce the nontestifying codefendants' statements, without redacting references to defendant, this was error under Bruton v United States (391 US 123 [1968]). However, we find the error harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]) in that there was overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt based upon the testimony of his cousin. The references to defendant in the codefendants' statements could not have affected the verdict. These brief references merely placed defendant at the scene, and his presence at the scene was essentially consistent with the defense theory of the case. Defendant's argument that the court should have delivered a limiting instruction is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. With regard to defendant's independent Confrontation Clause claim under Crawford v Washington (541 US 36 [2004]) based on the testimonial nature of the statements (see generally United States v Lung Fong Chen, 393 F3d 139, 150 [2004]), we likewise find any error harmless. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.