People v Weay
2008 NY Slip Op 06730 [54 AD3d 695]
September 2, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, October 29, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Sidiki Weay, Appellant.

[*1] Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York (Sarah J. Berger of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot and Suzanne H. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), dated October 28, 2005, which denied his postconviction motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had the DNA test results been admitted into evidence at trial (see CPL 440.30 [1-a]; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 961 [2007]; People v Figueroa, 36 AD3d 458 [2007]; People v Shenouda, 307 AD2d 938 [2003]; People v Pugh, 288 AD2d 634 [2001]; People v De Oliveira, 223 AD2d 766 [1996]). Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.