Matter of Arrathoon
2008 NY Slip Op 02023 [49 AD3d 325]
March 11, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 14, 2008


In the Matter of the Estate of Tigran Arrathoon, Deceased. Siran Arrathoon, Respondent; Maro A. Goldstone, Appellant.

[*1] Duane Morris LLP, New York City (Thomas R. Newman of counsel), for appellant.

Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale (John R. Morken of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Renee R. Roth, S.), entered October 9, 2007, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed respondent's claim that petitioner widow had abandoned decedent and was disqualified to elect against his will as his surviving spouse, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that respondent, who was petitioner and decedent's daughter, did not meet her burden of demonstrating that petitioner abandoned decedent during his lifetime (see Matter of Riefberg, 58 NY2d 134 [1983]; Matter of Maiden, 284 NY 429 [1940]; Matter of Gardner, 176 AD2d 142 [1991], lv dismissed 78 NY2d 1124 [1991]). The evidence established that petitioner and decedent, who had been married for 65 years, were each forced by circumstances to live with, or near, the child who could provide them with emotional and practical support, that neither spouse abandoned the other, and that their separate living arrangements were necessitated by their advanced age and failing health.

We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.