People v Manzino (Robert) |
2007 NY Slip Op 51215(U) [16 Misc 3d 126(A)] |
Decided on June 11, 2007 |
Appellate Term, Second Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon, Westchester County (William
Edwards, J.), rendered May 17, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of
harassment in the second degree.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Upon a review of the record, we are of the opinion that the evidence, when viewed in the
light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), was
legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of harassment in the second degree beyond a
reasonable doubt (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]). Intent to commit a crime may be implied by the
act itself, or by defendant's conduct and the surrounding
circumstances (see People v McGee, 204 AD2d 353 [1994]; People v
McTiernan, 13 Misc 3d 127[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51664[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th
Jud Dists]). Here, defendant's actions, evincing a threat of force, together with his accompanying
words, established his intent to harass, annoy or alarm the complainant (see People v
Dorns, 88 Misc 2d 1064 [1978], affd 96 Misc 2d 54 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud
Dists 1978]). Accordingly, the judgment convicting defendant of harassment in the second
degree is affirmed.
Rudolph, P.J., LaCava and Emerson, JJ., concur.
[*2]
Decision Date: June 11, 2007