Mozes v Shanaman
2005 NY Slip Op 06999 [21 AD3d 854]
September 29, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 16, 2005


Alan V. Mozes, Appellant,
v
Deborah Shanaman, Respondent. Michael Drexler, Appellant, v Mihai Popa, Respondent. Reiner M. Leist et al., Appellants, v Carol Wolff, Respondent.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered August 5, 2004, which, in these actions consolidated for the disposition of the subject summary judgment motions, granted the motions of defendant landlords for summary judgment dismissing the complaints as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

"The four-year Statute of Limitations applicable to both administrative and judicial rent overcharge claims, by its terms, commences to run with the 'first overcharge alleged' " (Matter of Brinckerhoff v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 275 AD2d 622, 622 [2000] [citations omitted], lv denied 96 NY2d 712 [2001]). Since the first overcharges alleged [*2]by plaintiff tenants occurred no later than 1996, these actions commenced in 2003 are time-barred (CPLR 213-a). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.