Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34258
F/
2005-09144
Carmen Arroyo, respondent, v J. C. Penny Corporation, Inc., appellant. (Index No. 16197/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 15, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34286
S/sl
2005-04317, 2005-06433
Antonio Carrero, respondent, v Dime Contractors, et al., appellants. (Index No. 48509/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 30, 2005, and June 10, 2005, respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 31, 2006, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34257
S/sl
2005-06516
Camille R. Caruso, respondent, v Franklin Avenue Plaza, LLC, et al., appellants, et al., defendant. (Index No. 009952/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 3, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 27, 2006, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34245
F/
2005-07487
Victor M. DeJesus, Jr., appellant, v Eileen Farley, respondent. (Index No. 13419/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 18, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34270
F/
2005-03851
Scott Dowd, et al., plaintiffs respondents- appellants, v City of New York, defendant third-party plaintiff respondent-appellant; Brooklyn Union Gas, defendant appellant- respondent. (Index No. 15462/96)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the respondent-appellant City of New York to withdraw a cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 3, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the cross-appeal by the City of New York is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34266
L/
2005-04266
Hanie Eng, et al., respondents-appellants, v Michael Sichenzia, et al., defendants, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, appellant-respondent. (Index No. 818/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant-respondent to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated March 24, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34263
S/sl
2005-06476
Samuel Festinger, appellant, v George Edrich, et al., respondents. (Index No. 18707/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 10, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 27, 2006, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34275
S/sl
2005-10329
Roy Forlong, et al., respondents, v Jamurath Faulton, et al., appellants. (Index No. 32685/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 28, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 23, 2006, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34247
F/
2004-04829
Imre Friedlander, respondent, v Flavio Ramos, appellant. (Index No. 107946/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term, Second & Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated May 24, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34265
F/
2005-06244
George Hadden, respondent, v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, et al., defendants, T. Moriarity & Son, Inc., appellant. (Index No. 9921/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 6, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34268
F/
2005-11623
Pedro Heridia, appellant, v Nestor Rodriguez, et al., respondents. (Index No. 13950/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 18, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34271
F/
2005-08385 Hyun Sook Lee, a/k/a Hyun Sook Kim, etc., appellant, v Elmhurst Gardens, Inc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 28372/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 20, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34278
S/sl
2005-05963
Philip Insinga, plaintiff-respondent, v F. C. General Contracting, et al., appellants, Rodney C. Hubbard, et al., defendants-respondents. (Index No. 18674/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants Ryder Han and Chung Woo Han pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 9, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the movants' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 4, 2006, and the movants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34284
S/sl
2005-03132, 2005-08424
International Shoppes, Inc., et al., appellants, v Arleigh Spencer, respondent.
(Index No. 10559/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 1, 2005, and June 30, 2005, respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before January 4, 2006.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34285
S/sl
2005-00994, 2005-00995 Jerry Keitel, et al., appellants-respondents, v Neil Kurtz, et al., respondents, Elliot Dreznick, respondent-appellant. (Index No. 23892/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents Ronald Bennett, Max I. Hamburger, Mark Tan, Rheumatology Associates of Long Island, Alan T. Kaell, and Paul E. Schulman pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2), on appeals and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 10, 2004, and a judgment of the same court dated January 13, 2005, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.
ORDERED that the application is granted, the movants' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 6, 2006, and the movants' brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34261
S/sl
2005-00994, 2005-00995
Jerry Keitel, et al., appellants-respondents, v Neil Kurtz, et al., respondents, Elliot Dreznick, respondent-appellant. (Index No. 23892/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents Charles Sitrin and Radiological Health Services, P.C., d/b/a New York Imaging Center pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2), on appeals and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 10, 2004, and a judgment of the same court dated January 13, 2005, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.
ORDERED that the application is granted, the movants' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 6, 2006, and the movants' brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34264
F/
2005-05760, 2005-05767
Kwang Hee Lee, appellant-respondent, v ADJMI 936 Realty Associates, et al., respondents-appellants. (Index No. 44511/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the respondent-appellant Ray Realty Fulton, Inc., to withdraw cross appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated May 20, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeals by Ray Realty Fulton, Inc., as marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34248
F/
2005-05159
Maria Laszczych, et al., respondents, v Yorkville Towers Associates, LP, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants; Royal Restoration, Inc., third-party defendant- appellant. (Index No. 11357/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants Yorkville Towers Associates, LP, R.Y. Management Co., Inc., and Sentry Contracting, Inc., to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 22, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Yorkville Towers Associates, LP, R.Y. Management Co., Inc., and Sentry Contracting, Inc., is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34256
F/
2005-06593
Legacy Homes, Inc., respondent, v Richard LeCausi, et al., appellants. (Index No. 16551/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 9, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34274
S/sl
2005-04339
Stephanie Lopez, respondent, v Simon Ajose, appellant. (Index No. 4863/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 29, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 27, 2006, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34260
F/
2005-08483
Salvatore Matarazzo, appellant, v Gerasimos Forianos, respondent. (Index No. 9054/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 27, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M33407
A/mv
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
SONDRA MILLER
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
2004-00945
Jonathan Miranda, etc., et al., appellants, v New York City Housing Authority, et al., defendants, Mitchell Rubber Products, Inc., respondent (and a third-party action). (Index No. 36586/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent for leave to reargue so much of a decision and order of this court dated May 9, 2005, as, upon determining an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 7, 2004, awarded costs to the appellants or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from so much of the decision and order as awarded costs to the appellants.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to reargue is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the decision and order dated May 9, 2005, in the above-entitled case is amended by deleting from the decretal paragraph thereof the words "with costs" and substituting therefor the words "without costs or disbursements"; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.
ADAMS, J.P., CRANE, S. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34259
F/
2005-08215
Adele Oberstein, respondent, v Sharyl Rice, appellant. (Index No. 13093/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34252
F/
2005-07361
Sandra Ortiz, respondent, v Gaetano Bonacquisto, et al., appellants. (Index No. 170/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated June 1, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34216
F/sl
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-05249 The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Walter Freeman, appellant.
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a determination of the County Court, Orange County, dated May 17, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the County Court and, pursuant to Correction Law § 168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the counsel assigned to represent him before the County Court, Orange County, continues on appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1103[d]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34250
F/
2005-06860
Richard Henry Ross, appellant, v Deborah Dowd Ross, respondent. (Index No. 1344/05)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 15, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34283
S/sl
2005-05811
Willard Stillman, appellant, v Edward Kalikow, et al., respondents.
(Index No. 3874/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before January 9, 2006.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34255
F/
2005-06732
Bennie L. Thomas, Jr., appellant, v Carol A. Litchfield-Thomas, respondent. (Index No. 200424/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 21, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34246
F/
2005-06865
Sarah-Ann Trayner, et al., appellants, v Joseph Gallo, et al., respondents. (Index No. 11859/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 7, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34251
F/
2005-08259
Jan Viserta, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v Hillside Village Condominium Association, appellant, Gem Community Management, Inc., defendant-respondent. (Index No. 5857/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 30, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34254
F/
2005-06734
Byron Voutsinas, respondent, v George Voutsinas, appellant. (Index No. 16736/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 12, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34249
F/
2005-09186
Kosto Vuljevic, respondent, v Danielle Nigro, et al., appellants. (Index No. 8270/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 29, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34267
F/
2005-07693
Monte Zarick, plaintiff-respondent, v MPK Automotive Holdings, Inc., et al., defendants-respondents, S & D Motors, Inc., etc., appellant. (Index No. 1056/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 30, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34262
F/
2005-06143
In the Matter of Victor Dunning, respondent, v Kristi Hill, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Kristi Dunning, appellant, v Victor Dunning, respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. V-04845/04, V-04846/04, V-05268/04, V-11527/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 2, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34276
K/nl
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
DAVID S. RITTER, JJ.
2003-05744 In the Matter of Amos Weinberg, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner; Amos Weinberg, respondent. (Registration No. 1622018)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent for an order modifying this court's opinion and order dated October 31, 2005, insofar as it disaffirmed the Special Referee's report and suspended the respondent for a period of one year, commencing November 30, 2005. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on May 24, 1978.
Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied in its entirety.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and RITTER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34269
S/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
PETER B. SKELOS
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
2005-11109 The People, etc., appellant, v Kevin Brown, respondent.
(Ind. No. 8004/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated December 27, 2005, in the above-entitled case is amended by deleting from the caption thereof after the words "The People, etc.", the word "respondent" and substituting therefor the word "appellant".
FLORIO, J.P., MASTRO, SKELOS and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34214
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-10931
The People, etc., respondent, v Derek Deal, appellant. (Ind. No. 1530-05)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 14, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
05 A 5427
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F - Red Schoolhouse Road
Fishkill, New York 12524-0445
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M33130
F/
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
DANAIEL F. LUCIANO
PETER B. SKELOS
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
2005-07369, 2005-07924
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Angelika Dotsenko, defendant. (Ind. No. 5053/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Leave to Serve Late Notice of Appeal, for Poor Person Relief & to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the defendant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 24, 2004, and a resentence of the same court, rendered December 2, 2004, for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
CRANE, J.P., LUCIANO, SKELOS, and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 G 0607
Bedford Hills Corr. Fac.
247 Harris Road - Box 1000
Bedford Hills, New York 10507
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34218
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-10497
The People, etc., respondent, v Anthony Dunlap, appellant. (Ind. No. 1707-04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 15, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
05 A 4969
Southport Corr. Fac.
P.O. Box 2000, Institution Road
Pine City, New York 14871
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34223
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-10634
The People, etc., respondent, v Etzer Estiverne, appellant. (Ind. No. 05-00069)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered September 27, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
James Licata
Office of the Public Defender
11 New Hemstead Road
New City, New York 10956-3664
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
05 A 5058
Central New York Psychiatric Center
P.O. Box 300
Marcy, New York 13403
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34213
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-09549
The People, etc., respondent, v Anthony Jones, appellant. (Ind. No. 2888-04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 6, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
05 R 3913
Collins Corr. Fac.
P.O. Box 340
Collins, New York 14034
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34215
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
2005-10499
The People, etc., respondent, v Douglas Jones, appellant. (Ind. No. 1828-05)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 17, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
05 A 5431
Lakeview Shock Incarceration Fac.
P.O. Box T
Brocton, New York 14716