Return to New Filings Page
For July 26, 2024, through August 1, 2024, no new preliminary appeal
statements were filed.
For August 2, 2024, through August 8, 2024, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
MATTER OF CLAIM OF ANDERSON (227 AD3d 63):
APL-2024-00096
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/28/24; reversal; leave granted by the Appellate Division
with certified question 7/18/24; Workers' Compensation--Whether a claimant's fear
of contracting a virus at her place of employment constitutes an accidental injury
that is compensable under section 2, paragraph 7 of the Workers' Compensation
Law; App. Div. on appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed
July 22, 2022, which ruled, among other things, that claimant did not sustain a
compensable injury and disallowed her claim for workers' compensation benefits,
reversed and remitted to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the
court's decision.
MATTER OF CLAIM OF DJANUZAKOV (225 AD3d 1107):
APL-2024-00097
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/28/24; reversal; leave granted by the Appellate Division
with certified question 7/18/24; Workers' Compensation--Whether a claimant's fear
of contracting a virus at his place of employment constitutes an accidental injury
that is compensable under section 2, paragraph 7 of the Workers' Compensation
Law; App. Div. on appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed
April 27, 2022, which ruled, among other things, that claimant did not sustain a
compensable injury and disallowed his claim for workers' compensation benefits,
reversed and remitted to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the
court's decision.
GRAND SOUTH POINT v BASSETT (— AD3d —, 2024 NY
Slip Op 03364):
APL-2024-00101
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/20/24; modification; sua sponte examination of whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as or right;
Constitutional Law--Whether Public Health Law § 2828, which limits the ways
nursing homes in New York can spend their revenues, is unconstitutional; Supreme
Court, Albany County, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint;
App. Div. modified by declaring that Public Health Law § 2828 is not unconstitutional on
its face, and, as so modified, affirmed.
PEOPLE v HEMINGWAY (CARISSA) (224 AD3d 1167):
APL-2024-00102
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 2/29/24; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by Halligan, J.,
7/31/24; Crimes--Accusatory Instrument--Whether the trial court's statutory
authority to order amendments to an indictment under CPL 200.70 encompasses an
amendment to an alleged underlying offense that is an element of a felony charge;
County Court, Clinton County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of
aggravated driving while intoxicated with a child passenger, driving while ability
impaired by drugs and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree
(two counts), and the traffic infraction of use of mobile telephones, App. Div. affirmed.
INTEGRATENYC v STATE OF NEW YORK (228 AD3d 152):
APL-2024-00099
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 5/2/24; modification; leave to appeal granted by the
Appellate Division 7/18/24 on a certified question; Schools--Whether plaintiffs'
complaint presents a justiciable controversy; whether plaintiffs stated a cause of
action under the Education Article of the New York Constitution, the Equal
Protection Clause, or the New York Human Rights Law; whether the State is a
proper defendant with respect to alleged violations of the Education Article;
Supreme Court, New York County, granted City defendants' 3211(a) (2),(7) motion to
dismiss; State defendants' 3211(a)(1)(2),(7) motion to dismiss and intervenor-defendant's
3211(a)(7) motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it did not present
a justiciable controversy; App. Div. modified to deny defendants' and intervenor
defendant's motions as to the first and second causes of action and that portion of the
third cause of action against Bill de Blasio, Mayor of the City of New York, the New
York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor, Meisha Porter based on the
denial of the use of its facilities, and otherwise affirmed. App. Div. addressed justiciable
controversy and failure to state a claim grounds for dismissal.
MATTER OF CLAIM OF MATTHEWS (225 AD3d 1109):
APL-2024-00095
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/28/24; reversal; leave granted by the Appellate Division
with certified question 7/18/24; Workers' Compensation--Whether a claimant's fear
of contracting a virus at his place of employment constitutes an accidental injury
that is compensable under section 2, paragraph 7 of the Workers' Compensation
Law; App. Div. on appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed
November 10, 2021, which ruled, among other things, that claimant did not sustain a
compensable injury and disallowed his claim for workers'compensation benefits, reversed
and remitted to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the court's
decision.
MATTER OF CLAIM OF MCLAURIN (225 AD3d 1105):
APL-2024-94
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/28/24; reversal; leave granted by the Appellate Division
with certified question 7/18/24; Workers' Compensation--Whether a claimant's fear
of contracting a virus at her place of employment constitutes an accidental injury
that is compensable under section 2, paragraph 7 of the Workers' Compensation
Law; App. Div. on appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed
April 16, 2022, which ruled, among other things, that claimant did not sustain a
compensable injury and disallowed her claim for workers' compensation benefits,
reversed and remitted to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the
court's decision.
NOFAL v YOUSEF (228 AD3d 772):
APL-2024-00091
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/12/24; affirmance; sua sponte examination of whether any
jurisdictional basis exists for an appeal as of right; Pleading--Sufficiency of Pleading--
Whether plaintiff's complaint stated a cause of action for defamation; alleged
constitutional violations; Supreme Court, Westchester County, granted defendants'
motion, in effect, under CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the amended complaint; App. Div.
affirmed insofar as appealed
from.
TEMAN v BRAVERMAN (2024 NY Slip Op 60324[U]):
APL-2024-104
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/9/24; denied motion; sua sponte examination of whether
the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution and whether any jurisdictional basis exists for an appeal as of right; Motions
and Orders; App. Div. denied motion for reargument of, or leave to appeal from,
November 2, 2023 Appellate Division order.