Return to New Filings Page
For July 25, 2014 through July 31, 2014, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
DENSON (RAYMOND), PEOPLE v (114 AD3d 543):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 2/18/14; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by Saxe,
J., 7/24/14; CRIMES - KIDNAPPING - ATTEMPT - RESTRAINT OF CHILD LESS
THAN 16 YEARS OLD - WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY
SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THAT DEFENDANT COMMITTED ATTEMPTED
KIDNAPPING IN THE SECOND DEGREE; PROOF OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS -
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY EXERCISED ITS DISCRETION IN
PERMITTING TESTIMONY REGARDING DEFENDANT'S PRIOR CONVICTION
OF SEX CRIME COMMITTED AGAINST A CHILD OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO,
AND THE FACTS UNDERLYING THAT CONVICTION, ON THE ISSUE OF
DEFENDANT'S INTENT; WHETHER THE ATTEMPTED KIDNAPPING CHARGE
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED UNDER THE MERGER DOCTRINE;
CONFESSION - WHETHER DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS TO POLICE WERE
ADMISSIBLE AS NONCUSTODIAL STATEMENTS AND POST-MIRANDA
STATEMENTS; RIGHT TO COUNSEL - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
OF TRIAL COUNSEL IN ALLOWING THE DEFENSE EXPERT TO TESTIFY
UNDER THE PREMISE THAT DEFENDANT WAS A PEDOPHILE AND IN
FAILING TO OBJECT WHEN THE PROSECUTION'S EXPERT BASED HER
CONCLUSIONS ON THAT PREMISE; Supreme Court, New York County, convicted
defendant, after a nonjury trial, of attempted kidnapping in the second degree and
endangering the welfare of a child, and sentenced him to an aggregate term of 10 years;
App. Div. affirmed.
GARCIA v CITY OF NEW YORK (115 AD3d 447):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 3/6/14; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by Court
of Appeals, 6/26/14; TORTS - FALSE IMPRISONMENT - FALSE ARREST -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT
PLAINTIFF FAILED TO REBUT THE PRESUMPTION OF PROBABLE CAUSE
RAISED BY A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT - ALLEGED POLICE COERCION
AND PERJURED TESTIMONY; CIVIL RIGHTS - FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM
- WHETHER PLAINTIFF ESTABLISHED THE EXISTENCE OF A TRIABLE ISSUE
OF FACT TO SUPPORT A CLAIM OF MUNICIPAL LIABILITY UNDER 42 USC §
1983; Supreme Court, Bronx County, granted the motion of defendants City of New
York, Police Officer John Florio and Detective Joseph Dietrich for summary judgment
dismissing the complaint in its entirety, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for partial
summary judgment on the issue of liability; App. Div. affirmed.
MACK (TERRANCE L.), PEOPLE v (117 AD3d 1450):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 5/2/14; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Lindley,
J., 6/30/14; CRIMES - JURORS - WHETHER COUNTY COURT COMMITTED
REVERSIBLE ERROR BY ACCEPTING THE JURY VERDICT WITHOUT FIRST
RESPONDING TO THREE NOTES FROM THE JURY; County Court, Monroe County,
convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of gang assault in the first degree, App. Div.
reversed and granted a new trial.
MARGARY, MATTER OF v MARTINEZ (118 AD3d 1004):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/25/14; modification; sua sponte examination
whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as
of right; CRIMES - FAMILY OFFENSE - DETERMINATION THAT RESPONDENT
COMMITTED THE FAMILY OFFENSE OF MENACING IN THE SECOND DEGREE
- ORDER OF PROTECTION; Family Court, Kings County, after a hearing in a family
offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, directed the issuance of an
order of protection in favor of petitioner and against respondent for a period of six
months and issued a separate order of protection covering a period up to and including
11/29/13; App. Div. modified, (1) the 5/31/13 Family Court order of fact-finding and
disposition, (a) by deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the words "six
months" and substituting therefor the words "five years," and (b) by adding thereto a
decretal paragraph finding that aggravating circumstances exist, including the use of a
dangerous instrument by the respondent against the petitioner; (2) modified the 5/31/13
Family Court order of protection, (a) by deleting the provision thereof directing that the
order of protection shall remain in force until and including 11/29/13, and substituting
therefor a provision directing that the order of protection shall remain in effect until and
including 5/31/18, and (b) by adding thereto a provision directing the respondent to stay
away from the petitioner's home, school, business, and place of employment up to and
including 5/31/18.
PELLETIER v LAHM (111 AD3d 807):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 11/20/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
App. Div., 7/11/14; Rule 500.11 review pending; NEGLIGENCE - EMERGENCY
DOCTRINE - WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GIVING AN
EMERGENCY DOCTRINE CHARGE TO THE JURY AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
CPLR 4404(a) MOTION; Supreme Court, Rockland County, upon a jury verdict in favor
of defendants and against plaintiff on the issue of liability, and upon an order of the same
court dated 6/14/11 denying his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the verdict
and for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability or, in the alternative, to set
aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial, awarded
judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, dismissing the complaint; App. Div.
affirmed.
RODRIGUEZ, MATTER OF v ZAMBELLI (119 AD3d 696):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 7/9/14; dismissal; sua sponte examination whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
PROCEEDING AGAINST BODY OR OFFICER - MANDAMUS - WHETHER
MANDAMUS LIES TO COMPEL RESPONDENT COUNTY COURT JUDGE TO
ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF CONVICTION SPECIFYING THAT THE
COMMENCEMENT DATE OF A RESENTENCE IMPOSED ON PETITIONER IN
2007 IS MARCH 23, 1999; App. Div., among other things, denied the petition and
dismissed the proceeding on the merits.
WASHINGTON, MATTER OF (2014 NY Slip Op 74443[U]):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/9/14; denial of application; sua sponte examination
whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as
of right; ATTORNEY AND CLIENT - REINSTATEMENT - SUSPENDED
ATTORNEY DENIED REINSTATEMENT CLAIMS DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL
PROTECTION VIOLATIONS; App. Div. denied attorney's application for reinstatement
to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law.