Return to New Filings Page
For July 15, 2016 through July 21, 2016, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
BETHUNE v MTA/LONG ISLAND BUS (2016 NY Slip Op
78374[U]):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/30/16; dismissal; sua sponte examination (1)
whether the June 30, 2016 Appellate Division order and March 2, 2016 Supreme Court
order finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; (2) whether,
insofar as taken from the June 30, 2016 Appellate Division order, any jurisdictional basis
exists to support the appeal taken as of right; and (3) whether a direct appeal lies to this
Court from the April 22, 2016 judgment and March 2, 2016 Supreme Court order
pursuant to CPLR 5601(b)(2); APPEAL - ORDERS - DISMISSAL OF APPEAL FROM
ORDER ON THE GROUND THAT THE RIGHT OF DIRECT APPEAL THEREFROM
TERMINATED UPON ENTRY OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT; DIRECT APPEAL
FROM SUPREME COURT ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE JURY
VERDICT AND FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED ON THE VERDICT; Supreme Court,
Nassau County, denied plaintiff's "untimely motion for an order vacating the
determination of the jury in favor of the defendant"; thereafter, Supreme Court entered
judgment in favor of defendant MTA/Long Island Bus and dismissed the complaint
against that defendant with prejudice; App. Div. dismissed the appeal from the Supreme
Court order entered 3/2/16, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom
terminated upon entry of the final judgment on 4/22/16.
BROOKS (NICHOLAS), PEOPLE v (134 AD3d 574):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 12/22/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 7/1/16; CRIMES - EVIDENCE - EXPERT WITNESS - WHETHER THE
TRIAL COURT ERRED IN (1) ALLOWING AN EXTENDED FRYE HEARING
REQUESTED BY THE PEOPLE TO CHALLENGE DEFENDANT'S EXPERT
WITNESS, AND IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A FRYE HEARING
REGARDING THE MEDICAL EXAMINER INTENDED TO BE PRESENTED BY
THE PEOPLE, (2) LIMITING THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT'S EXPERT,
INCLUDING THAT REGARDING CERTAIN DRUGS AND TOXICOLOGY, (3)
ALLOWING THE CLAIMED HEARSAY TESTIMONY OF 11 OF DECEDENT'S
FRIENDS TO SHOW THE VICTIM'S UNFAVORABLE PERCEPTION OF
DEFENDANT'S CHARACTER, AND (4) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
SET ASIDE THE VERDICT BASED ON JUROR MISCONDUCT; Supreme Court,
New York County, convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second
degree, and sentenced him to a term of 25 years to life; App. Div. affirmed.
MIZRAHI-SROUR v SROUR (138 AD3d 801):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 4/13/16; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
HUSBAND AND WIFE AND OTHER DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIPS - JUDGMENT
OF DIVORCE - VARIOUS ALLEGED IMPROPRIETIES OF TRIAL COURT AND
LAW GUARDIAN; Supreme Court, Kings County, awarded plaintiff wife sole custody
of the parties' children, with limited visitation to defendant husband, awarded plaintiff
maintenance and support arrears, distributed 70% of the marital assets to plaintiff, and
awarded plaintiff counsel fees; App. Div. affirmed.
NAZARIO v 222 BROADWAY, LLC (135 AD3d 506):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/14/16; modification; leave to appeal granted by
App. Div., 6/16/16; Rule 500.11 review pending; NEGLIGENCE - PLAINTIFF
INJURED WHEN HE AND LADDER UPON WHICH HE WAS STANDING FELL
AFTER PLAINTIFF RECEIVED ELECTRICAL SHOCK - WHETHER APPELLATE
DIVISION ERRED IN GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S LABOR LAW § 240(1) CLAIM;
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LIABILITY OF PARTIES FOR
CONTRACTUAL INDEMNIFICATION AGAINST THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
KNIGHT ELECTRICAL SERVICES CORP.; Supreme Court, New York County, denied
plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6)
claims, and upon a search of the record, dismissed those claims, and granted defendants'
motions for summary judgment on their contractual indemnification claims against third-
party defendant; App. Div. modified to reinstate the Labor Law § 240(1) claim and grant
plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on that claim, and to deny defendant 222
Broadway, LLC's motion for summary judgment on its contractual indemnification claim,
and otherwise affirmed.
WOODS, MATTER OF v STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (139 AD3d 1322):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 5/26/16; reversal with two-Justice dissent; Rule
500.11 review pending; ARBITRATION - COMPULSORY ARBITRATION -
WHETHER PETITIONER HAD THE RIGHT UNDER THE APPLICABLE
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE COLLEGE'S
TERMINATION OF HIS EMPLOYMENT, WHERE HE WAS A PROBATIONARY
EMPLOYEE AT THE TIME BASED UPON A PRIOR ARBITRATION AWARD;
WHETHER THE COLLEGE HAD A RATIONAL BASIS FOR TERMINATING
PETITIONER'S EMPLOYMENT; Supreme Court, Albany County, in a proceeding
seeking to compel arbitration, among other things, converted the proceeding to one
seeking to confirm an October 2013 arbitration award pursuant to CPLR 7511 and
directed the parties to seek clarification of the award; App. Div. reversed and granted the
petition to compel arbitration.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. YONAMINE v CONNOLLY (140 AD3d 1098):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/22/16; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
HABEAS CORPUS - WHEN REMEDY APPROPRIATE - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION CORRECTLY REJECTED RELATOR'S CLAIMS BASED
UPON AN ALLEGED O'RAMA ERROR (see PEOPLE v O'RAMA, 78 NY2d 270) AND
AN ALLEGED DEPRIVATION OF HIS RIGHT TO BE PRESENT AT ALL
MATERIAL STAGES OF THE PROCEEDINGS; Supreme Court, Dutchess County, in a
proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, denied the petition
and dismissed the proceeding, without a hearing; App. Div. affirmed.
For July 22, 2016 through July 28, 2016, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
ADVANCED THERAPY, MATTER OF v NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION (140 AD3d 1367):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/9/16; reversal; sua sponte examination whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
SCHOOLS - EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT'S DETERMINATION FINDING NO REGIONAL NEED FOR
PETITIONER'S PRESCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAM WAS BASED UPON A
RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS
(9 NYCRR 200.7[a][2]; 200.20[a]); WHETHER EDUCATIONAL LAW § 4410 IS
UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE, OR THE CHALLENGED DETERMINATION
VIOLATED GENERAL BUSINESS LAW § 308 OR PETITIONER'S RIGHT OF
FREEDOM TO CONTRACT; Supreme Court, Albany County, granted petitioner's
application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of
respondent finding there was no regional need for petitioner's preschool special education
program; App. Div. reversed, confirmed the determination and dismissed the petition.
ARJUNE (MARIO), PEOPLE v (138 AD3d 877):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 4/13/16; denial of writ of error coram nobis; leave to
appeal granted by Fahey, J., 7/13/16; CRIMES - APPEAL - DENIAL OF
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS SEEKING TO
REINSTATE AN APPEAL ON THE GROUND OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
TRIAL COUNSEL, WHERE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS TIMELY FILED BUT
THE APPEAL WAS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY PERFECT -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT
DEFENDANT "HAS NOT ESTABLISHED HIS ENTITLEMENT TO THE RELIEF
REQUESTED (see PEOPLE v SYVILLE,(15 NY3d 391)"; App. Div. denied defendant's
application for a writ of error coram nobis on appeal from a Supreme Court, Queens
County, judgment of conviction, rendered 11/12/09, to reinstate an appeal on the ground
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, where the notice of appeal was timely filed but
the appeal was dismissed by decision and order on motion of the Appellate Division dated
12/9/13, for failure to timely perfect.
BONIE (NASEAN), PEOPLE v (141 AD3d 401):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 7/5/16; modification; sua sponte examination whether
the conclusion of the criminal trial renders the appeal moot, whether a civil appeal lies
from the Appellate Division order appealed from and whether a substantial constitutional
question is directly involved to support the appeal taken as of right; SHIELD LAW -
ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 OF THE NEW YORK CONSTITUTION - QUALIFIED
PRIVILEGE FOR UNPUBLISHED NONCONFIDENTIAL NEWS - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE PEOPLE MADE THE
"CLEAR AND SPECIFIC SHOWING" REQUIRED TO OVERCOME NEWS
ORGANIZATION'S QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE AS TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF
UNAIRED VIDEO FOOTAGE OF AN INTERVIEW WITH DEFENDANT; Supreme
Court, Bronx County, granted the People's motion to compel nonparty Dina Sforza, a
representative of News 12 The Bronx, L.L.C., to comply with a subpoena, to the extent of
directing an in camera review of unpublished video footage of the News 12 reporter's
interview of defendant, and denied News 12's cross motion to, inter alia, quash the
subpoena; App. Div. modified to the extent of directing the trial judge to disclose to the
People after in camera review only those portions of the video footage in which defendant
makes any statement concerning killing the victim, or discusses their relationship and his
impressions and observations of her, including her conduct as a tenant, and otherwise
affirmed.
BRUCKNER REALTY, LLC, MATTER OF v CRUZ (139 AD3d 413):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 5/3/16; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by App.
Div., 7/14/16; Rule 500.11 review pending; LANDLORD AND TENANT - RENT
REGULATION - WHETHER LANDLORD ESTABLISHED AS A MATTER OF LAW
THAT THE GARAGE SPACE WAS NOT A REQUIRED ANCILLARY SERVICE
UNDER RENT STABILIZATION; Civil Court, Bronx County, granted petitioner
landlord's motion to dismiss respondent tenant's defenses and for summary judgment of
possession of a garage space in a holdover summary proceeding; App. Term modified to
deny the parts of petitioner's summary judgment motion that sought to dismiss
respondent's second and third "affirmative defenses" and first and second "defenses" and
for summary judgment of possession; App. Div. affirmed.
DAVIS v SCOTTISH RE GROUP LIMITED (138 AD3d 230):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 3/10/16; modification with a two-Justice dissent;
leave to appeal granted by App. Div., 7/7/16; CORPORATIONS - MERGER - ACTION
BY MINORITY SHAREHOLDER ASSERTING BOTH DIRECT AND DERIVATIVE
CAUSES OF ACTION ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDLY UNDERVALUED CASH-
OUT MERGER THAT UNFAIRLY PREJUDICED MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS;
STANDING; CHOICE OF LAW; JURISDICTION; DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
CAUSES OF ACTION; Supreme Court, New York County, among other things, granted
defendants' motions to dismiss the fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth and tenth causes of action
for lack of standing, and to dismiss the complaint as against Benton Street Partners for
lack of jurisdiction; App. Div. modified to allow plaintiff to replead, as limited in the
court's decision, the fourth and sixth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed.
EDWARD (ALBERT), PEOPLE v (51 Misc 3d 36):
App. Term, 1st Dept. order of 3/22/16; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
DiFiore, Ch.J., 7/13/16; CRIMES - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - SUFFICIENCY OF
ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT - WHETHER FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS WERE
SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT CHARGE OF CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A
WEAPON IN THE FOURTH DEGREE, WHERE DEFENDANT WAS ARRESTED
FOR TRESPASSING IN THE LOBBY OF A HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING
AND THE ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT ALLEGED THAT, UPON HIS ARREST,
THE POLICE RECOVERED "A BOX CUTTER FROM THE DEFENDANT AND
DEFENDANT STATED IN SUBSTANCE, I USE IT ON THE TRAIN FOR
PROTECTION" - POSSESSION OF "DANGEROUS KNIFE" OR A "DANGEROUS
OR DEADLY INSTRUMENT OR WEAPON" WITH INTENT TO USE IT
"UNLAWFULLY AGAINST ANOTHER" (PENAL LAW § 265.01[2]); Criminal Court
of the City of New York, New York County, convicted defendant, upon his guilty plea, of
criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree; App. Term affirmed.
TAYLOR, PEOPLE ex rel. v DOLCE (140 AD3d 1716):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 6/10/16; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
HABEAS CORPUS - WHEN REMEDY AVAILABLE - WHETHER HABEAS
CORPUS LIES WHERE CHALLENGED ERRORS WERE OR COULD HAVE BEEN
RAISED ON DIRECT APPEAL OR POST-JUDGMENT MOTION; Supreme Court,
Orleans County, dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus; App. Div. affirmed.
WANG v LSUC (2016 NY Slip Op 79492 137 AD3d 520):
1st Dept. App. Div. orders of 3/10/16 and 7/14/16; affirmance and denial of
reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals; sua sponte examination whether
the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution and whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to
support an appeal as of right; COURTS - JURISDICTION - LONG-ARM
JURISDICTION - WHETHER THE COURTS BELOW PROPERLY HELD THAT
PLAINTIFF FAILED TO SHOW DEFENDANTS TRANSACTED SIGNIFICANT
BUSINESS IN NEW YORK OR ANY IN-STATE CONNECTION TO HIS CLAIMS;
CRIMES - CONSPIRACY - WHETHER THE COURTS BELOW CORRECTLY
CONCLUDED THAT PLAINTIFF FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT
DEFENDANTS WERE SUBJECT TO CONSPIRACY JURISDICTION; Supreme
Court, New York County, granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint, with
prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction; App. Div. affirmed, and thereafter, denied plaintiff's
motions for reargument or leave to appeal.