Return to New Filings Page
For June 5, 2015 through June 11, 2015, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
MATTER OF JONES v HICKEY (2015 NY Slip Op 74006[U]):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 5/15/15; denial of motion; sua sponte examination
whether the order appealed from finally determines the proceeding within the meaning of
the Constitution; MOTIONS AND ORDERS - APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER
DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS;
App. Div. denied appellant's motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
KNIGHT v STATE OF NEW YORK (127 AD3d 1435):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 4/16/15; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
STATE - CLAIM AGAINST STATE - CLAIM THAT STATE FAILED TO RENDER
PROPER MEDICAL CARE TO PRISONER CLAIMANT WHEN IT DECIDED HE NO
LONGER REQUIRED THE USE OF A CANE AND CONFISCATED IT - PRISONER
FELL AND SUSTAINED PERSONAL INJURIES - WHETHER CLAIMANT
PROVIDED COMPETENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CLAIM; NEGLIGENCE -
EXPERT TESTIMONY; Court of Claims, after a trial, found in favor of defendant and
dismissed the claim; App. Div. affirmed.
KORELIS v CONRIV REALTY CORP. (2015 NY Slip Op
63159[U]):
1st Dept. App. Div. order 2/5/15 and Supreme Court, New York County order of
9/5/14; denial of poor person relief; sua sponte examination whether the orders finally
determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and whether any
jurisdictional basis exists to appeal the orders as of right; APPEAL - POOR PERSONS -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN DENYING PLAINTIFF'S CPLR
5704(a) MOTION FOR POOR PERSON RELIEF; Supreme Court, New York County,
denied plaintiff's motion to proceed as a poor person and declined to sign the order to
show cause bringing on the motion; App. Div. denied plaintiff's CPLR 5704(a) motion for
certain relief denied by Supreme Court in its 9/5/14 order, and for other relief.
PETKE (HAROLD L.), PEOPLE v (125 AD3d 1103):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 2/19/15; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Read, J.,
5/11/15; CRIMES - JURORS - IMPROPER DENIAL OF CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE -
WHETHER HARMLESS ERROR ANALYSIS SHOULD BE APPLIED WHERE THE
TRIAL COURT FAILED TO DISCHARGE A JUROR FOR CAUSE, DEFENDANT
USED A PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE ON THAT JUROR, THE ONE ADDITIONAL
JUROR SELECTED AFTER DEFENDANT EXHAUSTED HIS PEREMPTORY
CHALLENGES DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN DELIBERATIONS DUE TO A
MEDICAL SITUATION, DEFENDANT HAD BEEN GIVEN ADDITIONAL
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES WHEN SELECTING ALTERNATIVE JURORS,
AND DEFENDANT CHOOSE NOT TO EXERCISE A PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
ON THE ALTERNATE JUROR WHO REPLACED THE ILL JUROR; County Court,
St. Lawrence County, convicted defendant of seven counts of promoting a sexual
performance by a child, six counts of possessing a sexual performance by a child, and
four counts of obscenity in the third degree; App. Div. reversed and remitted to County
Court for a new trial.
THOMPSON (RITA), PEOPLE v (46 Misc 3d 136(A)):
App. Term, 1st Dept. order of 12/31/14; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 5/13/15; Rule 500.11 review pending; CRIMES - PLEA OF GUILTY -
SUFFICIENCY OF ALLOCUTION - WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS -
WHETHER THE RECORD ESTABLISHED THAT DEFENDANT KNOWINGLY,
VOLUNTARILY AND INTELLIGENTLY WAIVED HER BOYKIN RIGHTS WHERE
THE TRIAL COURT INQUIRED WHETHER DEFENDANT UNDERSTOOD SHE
WAS GIVING UP HER RIGHT TO A TRIAL, BUT FAILED TO MENTION OTHER
BOYKIN RIGHTS; Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County,
convicted defendant, upon her guilty plea, of harassment in the second degree, and
imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
For June 12, 2015 through June 18, 2015, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
BRAHNEY (RYAN P.), PEOPLE v (126 AD3d 1286):
4th Dept. App. Div. orders of 3/20/15; affirmances; leave to appeal granted by
Lindley, J., 6/1/15; CRIMES - SENTENCE - CONCURRENT AND CONSECUTIVE
TERMS - WHETHER COUNTY COURT ERRED IN DIRECTING THAT THE
SENTENCES FOR INTENTIONAL MURDER AND BURGLARY RUN
CONSECUTIVELY; MURDER - FAILURE TO PROVE DEFENSE OF EXTREME
EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE - EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT'S VIOLENT
HISTORY - WHETHER THE COURTS BELOW ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT
THE FACTS, INCLUDING EXTREME BRUTALITY OF THE CRIME, WERE
INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THE DEFENSE OF EXTREME EMOTIONAL
DISTURBANCE; CONFESSIONS - WAIVER OF RIGHT TO HUNTLEY HEARING
REGARDING CERTAIN POLICE TESTIMONY - HARMLESS ERROR; County
Court, Cayuga County, convicted defendant, after a bench trial, of two counts of murder
in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal contempt in the first
degree; the same court resentenced defendant as a second felony offender and directed
that the sentences on the two counts of burglary in the first degree, which run
concurrently with each other, shall run consecutively to the sentence imposed on the
count of intentional murder in the second degree; App. Div. dismissed the appeal from the
judgment insofar as it imposed sentence and otherwise affirmed, and affirmed the
resentence.
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATION, INC, MATTER OF v NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF STATE (125 AD3d 21):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 12/11/14; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Court
of Appeals, 6/4/15; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION - ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY REVIEW - WHETHER PETITIONER'S LICENSE RENEWAL
APPLICATION TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TRIGGERS
CONSISTENCY REVIEW UNDER THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT
AND NEW YORK'S COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) - WHETHER
CERTAIN GENERATING PLANT UNITS WERE GRANDFATHERED PURSUANT
TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT; WHETHER
QUALIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS WERE
PREPARED FOR THE UNITS; WHETHER SUBSEQUENT CHANGES TO UNITS
HAVE TRIGGERED A CONSISTENCY REVIEW UNDER THE CMP; Supreme Court,
Albany County, dismissed petitioners' application, in a combined CPLR article 78
proceeding and action for declaratory judgment, to review a determination of respondent
Department of State denying petitioners' request for a declaration that their power plants
are exempt from New York's Coastal Management Program; App. Div. reversed, granted
the petition and declared that Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant Unit Nos. 2 and 3 are
exempt from New York's Coastal Management Program.
EZZARD v ONE EAST RIVER PLACE REALTY CO., LLC (— AD3d —, 2015 NY
Slip Op 03791):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 5/5/15; modification; sua sponte examination whether
the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution; NEGLIGENCE - MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES - MISLEVELING OF
ELEVATORS - RES IPSA LOQUITOR - WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION
CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT
EXIST AS TO WHETHER THE BUILDING'S ELEVATOR WAS MISLEVELED OR
PLAINTIFF MERELY STUMBLED, PRECLUDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR
DEFENDANT ELEVATOR SERVICE MAINTENANCE COMPANY ON
PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM BASED ON RES IPSA LOQUITOR; Supreme Court, New York
County, (1) denied plaintiff's motion for spoliation sanctions, (2) granted motions by
defendants One East River Place Realty Co. and Solow Management Corp. for summary
judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims as to them and (3) denied defendant
New York Elevator & Electrical Corp.'s motion for leave to file an untimely motion for
summary judgment and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it; App.
Div. modified by granting defendant New York Elevator & Electrical Corp.'s motion for
consideration of its untimely motion for summary judgment, and upon such consideration,
granted the motion to the extent of dismissing the notice-based claims and otherwise
denied the motion as to the claim based on res ipsa loquitor, and otherwise affirmed.
FINERTY v ABEX CORPORATION (125 AD3d 564):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 2/26/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by App.
Div., 6/9/15; PRODUCTS LIABILITY - EXPOSURE TO TOXIC SUBSTANCES -
ASBESTOS - WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT
FORD MOTOR COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO LIABILITY FOR INJURIES
RESULTING FROM ASBESTOS-CONTAINING AUTO PARTS MANUFACTURED
AND DISTRIBUTED IN IRELAND BY ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY,
UPON THE GROUND THAT FORD MOTOR COMPANY "ACTED AS THE
GLOBAL GUARDIAN OF THE FORD BRAND, HAVING A SUBSTANTIAL ROLE
IN THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND USE OF THE AUTO PARTS
DISTRIBUTED" BY ITS SUBSIDIARY, "WITH THE APPARENT GOAL OF THE
COMPLETE STANDARDIZATION OF ALL PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE THAT
CARRIED THE SIGNATURE FORD LOGO"; Supreme Court, New York County,
denied defendant Ford Motor Company's motion for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint and to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action; App. Div. affirmed.
McCULLOUGH (JAMELL R.), PEOPLE v (126 AD3d 1452):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 3/27/15; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Scudder,
P.J., 5/21/15; CRIMES - WITNESSES - EXPERT WITNESS - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE TRIAL COURT
ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN PRECLUDING EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE
RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN GRANTING A NEW TRIAL RATHER THAN
REMITTING FOR A FRYE HEARING; Supreme Court, Monroe County, convicted
defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree
and attempted robbery in the first degree; App. Div. reversed and granted a new trial.
230 PARK AVENUE HOLDCO, LLC v KURZMAN KARELSEN & FRANK, LLP
(124 AD3d
477):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/20/15; affirmance with a two-Justice dissent; leave
to appeal granted by App. Div., 5/7/15; LANDLORD AND TENANT - LEASE - RIGHT
TO SUBLEASE OR ASSIGN - WHETHER THE COURTS BELOW PROPERLY
INTERPRETED A STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AS GRANTING THE TENANT
THE RIGHT TO LOCATE PROSPECTIVE TENANTS FOR THE PREMISES;
WHETHER THE COURTS BELOW CORRECTLY CONCLUDED THAT TRIABLE
ISSUES OF FACT EXIST AS TO WHETHER THE LANDLORD BREACHED THE
STIPULATION; Supreme Court, New York County, as relevant here, denied that part of
plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the affirmative defense of
breach of a stipulation, and granted that part of the motion seeking dismissal of the
affirmative defense of surrender; App. Div. affirmed.
For June 19, 2015 through June 25, 2015, the following preliminary appeal
statements were filed:
KENNETH COLE PRODUCTIONS, MATTER OF (122 AD3d 500):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 11/20/14; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Court of Appeals, 6/10/15; CORPORATIONS - MERGER - "GOING PRIVATE"
MERGER - FAIRNESS TO MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS - WHETHER THE
ENTIRE FAIRNESS STANDARD APPLIES TO GOING-PRIVATE MERGERS;
BUSINESS JUDGMENT DOCTRINE - PRE-DISCOVERY DISMISSAL - WHETHER
THE COURTS BELOW CORRECTLY DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT UNDER THE
BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE; Supreme Court, New York County, granted defendants'
motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211; App. Div. affirmed.
LEWIS, MATTER OF v NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
CORPORATION (126 AD3d 442):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 3/5/15; confirmation of determination and denial of
petition; sua sponte examination whether a substantial constitutional question is directly
involved to support an appeal as of right; CIVIL RIGHTS - DISCRIMINATION BASED
ON DISABILITY - CPLR ARTICLE 78 PROCEEDING TO REVIEW THE
DETERMINATION OF RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN
RIGHTS THAT THERE WAS NO PROBABLE CAUSE THAT RESPONDENT NEW
YORK HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION ENGAGED IN UNLAWFUL
DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES AGAINST PETITIONER; App. Div. confirmed the
determination, denied the petition and dismissed the CPLR article 78 proceeding.
SMALLING (OMAR A.), PEOPLE v (126 AD3d 820):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/11/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Fahey, J., 6/9/15; CRIMES - INSTRUCTIONS - SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION -
WHETHER SUPREME COURT ERRED WHEN IT GAVE A SUPPLEMENTAL
INSTRUCTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTIVE POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN
RESPONSE TO A NOTE FROM THE JURY; Supreme Court, Queens County,
convicted defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal
possession of a weapon in the third degree, and tampering with physical evidence, upon a
jury verdict, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
SUAREZ, MATTER OF v WILLIAMS (128 AD3d 20):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 3/20/15; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Court of
Appeals, 6/9/15; PARENT, CHILD AND FAMILY - CUSTODY - AWARD OF
CUSTODY TO GRANDPARENTS - EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT
PETITIONER GRANDPARENTS FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE EXTRAORDINARY
CIRCUMSTANCES SUFFICIENT TO DEPRIVE RESPONDENT MOTHER OF
CUSTODY OF HER CHILD; Family Court, Onondaga County, in a proceeding pursuant
to Family Court Act article 6, awarded petitioners Laura Suarez and Ricardo Suarez and
respondent Ernesto Suarez joint legal custody of the subject child; App. Div. reversed and
dismissed the petition.
UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v STYLE MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES CORP. (125 AD3d 759):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 2/11/15; reversal; leave to appeal granted by App.
Div., 6/15/15; SUBROGATION - RIGHT OF SUBROGATION - WHETHER THE
STYLE MANAGEMENT DEFENDANTS WERE ENTITLED TO SUMMARY
JUDGMENT DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT AS AGAINST THEM UPON THE
GROUND THAT THEY WERE NOT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ON THE
UNDERLYING RENOVATION PROJECT EVEN THOUGH ONE OF THOSE
DEFENDANTS WAS LISTED AS THE CONTRACTOR ON THE WORK PERMIT;
Supreme Court, Nassau County, in a subrogation action to recover benefits paid by
plaintiff insurer under a policy of insurance, denied the motion by defendants Style
Management Associates Corp., Style Management Corp., and Yosi Sason, also known as
Yosef Sason, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against
them; App. Div. reversed and granted the motion.
VILLAR v HOWARD (126 AD3d 1297):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 3/20/15; modification; leave to appeal granted by
App. Div., 6/12/15; MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS - NOTICE OF CLAIM - NOTICE
NOT REQUIRED FOR CLAIM AGAINST SHERIFF ARISING OUT OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT OF INMATE - NO DUTY BY COUNTY TO INDEMNIFY SHERIFF -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT PLAINTIFF
WAS NOT REQUIRED TO SERVE A NOTICE OF CLAIM UNDER GENERAL
MUNICIPAL LAW § 50-e; NEGLIGENCE - DUTY - DUTY TO PROTECT INMATE
FROM SEXUAL ASSAULT BY FELLOW JAIL INMATE - POTENTIAL LIABILITY
FOR DEPUTIES' NEGLIGENT TRAINING AND SUPERVISION - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT DEFENDANT OWED A
DUTY OF CARE TO PLAINTIFF; SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES - LIABILITY
FOR NEGLIGENCE - SEXUAL ASSAULT OF JAIL INMATE - NO IMMUNITY
OWING TO ALLEGEDLY DISCRETIONARY ACTS OF SHERIFF - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE ISSUE WHETHER
DEFENDANT'S ALLEGED ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE WERE DISCRETIONARY
AND THUS IMMUNE FROM LIABILITY CONSTITUTED A FACTUAL QUESTION
THAT CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THE PLEADING STAGE; Supreme Court,
Erie County, granted defendant's CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss the complaint; App. Div.
modified by denying defendant's motion in part and reinstating the complaint except to
the extent that it alleges that defendant is vicariously liable for the negligence of his
deputy sheriffs and, as modified, affirmed.
WESTCHESTER JOINT WATER WORKS, MATTER OF v ASSESSOR OF CITY OF
RYE (120 AD3d
1352):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 9/17/14; modification; leave to appeal granted by
Court of Appeals, 6/11/15; TAXATION - ASSESSMENT - REAL PROPERTY TAX
LAW ARTICLE 7 PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASSESSMENTS ON TWO
PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY, ONE LOCATED WHOLLY WITHIN THE RYE
NECK DISTRICT AND ONE WHOLLY LOCATED IN THE RYE CITY SCHOOL
DISTRICT - NOTICE OF THE PROCEEDINGS INITIALLY GIVEN ONLY TO THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - WHETHER THE
COURTS BELOW ERRED IN DETERMINING THAT THE DISMISSAL OF THE
PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RPTL 708(3) PRECLUDED CPLR 205(a) RELIEF
TO RECOMMENCE THE PROCEEDINGS; Supreme Court, Westchester County,
among other things, granted that branch of the intervenor school district's motion which
was to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the notices of petition and petitions
were not served upon the school district superintendent in accordance with RPTL 708(3),
and denied that branch of petitioner's cross motion which was for leave to recommence
the proceedings pursuant to CPLR 205(a); App. Div. modified by (1) deleting the
provision granting that branch of the intervenor school district's motion which was to
dismiss the proceedings, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the
motion only to the extent that the proceedings related to the parcel designated on the City
of Rye Assessment Roll as section 200, block 1, lot 9, and otherwise denying that branch
of the motion, and (2) deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the City
Assessor's cross motion which was to dismiss the proceedings, and substituting therefor a
provision granting that branch of the cross motion only to the extent that the proceedings
related to the above-described parcel, and otherwise denying that branch of the cross
motion, and as so modified, affirmed.
WILLIAMS (LEONARD), PEOPLE v (123 AD3d 1152):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 12/31/14; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 6/19/15; CRIMES - ARGUMENT AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL -
WHETHER POWER POINT PRESENTATION USED BY PROSECUTOR IN
SUMMATION DEPRIVED DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL -
MISCHARACTERIZATION OF TRIAL EVIDENCE - CURATIVE INSTRUCTIONS;
RIGHT TO COUNSEL - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
FOR FAILING TO OBJECT TO VARIOUS COMMENTS DURING PROSECUTOR'S
SUMMATION; Supreme Court, Kings County, convicted defendant of burglary in the
first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and assault in the
second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.