Return to New Filings Page
For June 1, 2012 through June 7, 2012, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
DELISER (JOSUE), PEOPLE v (85 AD3d 1047):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/21/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Jones, J., 6/1/12; CRIMES - PLEA OF GUILTY - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHO PURPORTEDLY TOOK AN ADVERSE
POSITION TO DEFENDANT ON DEFENDANT'S UNSUCCESSFUL PRO SE
MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS GUILTY PLEAS; Supreme Court, Kings County
convicted defendant of attempted murder in the second degree under Indictment No.
2938/06, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 5477/07, upon his guilty
pleas, and imposed sentences; App. Div. affirmed.
OLIVERAS (GEORGE), PEOPLE v (90 AD3d 563):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 12/27/11; reversal with dissents; leave to appeal
granted by Catterson, J., 4/12/12; CRIMES - RIGHT TO COUNSEL - EFFECTIVE
REPRESENTATION - WHETHER DEFENDANT HAD EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
OF COUNSEL WHERE HIS COUNSEL FAILED TO OBTAIN HIS MEDICAL
RECORDS OR TO CONSULT WITH AN EXPERT PSYCHIATRIST OR
PSYCHOLOGIST TO SUPPORT THE DEFENSE CLAIM THAT DEFENDANT
LACKED THE MENTAL CAPACITY TO VOLUNTARILY CONFESS TO A CRIME -
ONLY EVIDENCE LINKING DEFENDANT TO CRIME WAS HIS STATEMENTS
TO POLICE; Supreme Court, Bronx County denied defendant's CPL 440.10 motion to
vacate a 2/13/02 judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree and sentencing
him to 25 years to life; App. Div. reversed, granted defendant's CPL 440.10 motion, and
remanded the matter for a new trial.
STANLEY (HILBERT), PEOPLE v (92 AD3d 176):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/12/12; affirmance with dissents; leave to appeal
granted by Smith, J., 5/11/12; Rule 500.11 review pending; CRIMES - RIGHT TO
COUNSEL - CLAIMED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING
TO PURSUE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO CHARGE OF ROBBERY IN THE FIRST
DEGREE BECAUSE THE "WEAPON" DISPLAYED DURING THE ROBBERY WAS
NOT A "LOADED WEAPON FROM WHICH A SHOT, READILY CAPABLE OF
PRODUCING DEATH OR OTHER SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY, COULD BE
DISCHARGED" (PENAL LAW § 160.15[4]); CHALLENGE TO SHOW-UP
IDENTIFICATION; Supreme Court, Bronx County convicted defendant, after a jury trial,
of robbery in the first degree, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
For June 8, 2012 through June 14, 2012, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
AUGUSTINE (TRAVIS), PEOPLE v (89 AD3d 1238):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 11/10/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Jones, J., 6/1/12; CRIMES - SUPPRESSION HEARING - WHETHER COUNTY
COURT PROPERLY DENIED DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS HIS
STATEMENTS MADE TO POLICE - WHETHER DEFENDANT WAS
REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL ON AN UNRELATED VIOLATION OF
PROBATION CHARGE SO THAT QUESTIONING COULD NOT TAKE PLACE ON
THE MURDER AND OTHER CHARGES UNLESS COUNSEL WAS PRESENT OR
DEFENDANT WAIVED HIS RIGHTS IN COUNSEL'S PRESENCE; SUFFICIENCY
OF THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL; RIGHT TO FORMAL COMPLAINT ABOUT
EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNSEL; Greene County Court convicted defendant of the
crimes of murder in the second degree, aggravated cruelty to animals and two counts of
criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree; App. Div. affirmed.
BHUGRA v MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (94 AD3d 563):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 4/17/12; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution and whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to
support an appeal as of right; STIPULATIONS - CHALLENGE TO APPELLATE
DIVISION ORDER AFFIRMING A SUPREME COURT ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO ACCEPT SERVICE OF ANSWER UPON
THE GROUND THAT THE ANSWER WAS TIMELY SERVED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A STIPULATION SIGNED BY COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS AND
PLAINTIFF'S PRIOR COUNSEL; Supreme Court, New York County granted the cross
motion of defendants Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, Centre Life Insurance
Company, Centre Solutions, and Zurich American Insurance Company to compel plaintiff
to accept service of their answer; App. Div. affirmed.
MITCHELL (ROBERT), PEOPLE v (89 AD3d 628):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 11/29/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Jones, J., 6/1/12; CRIMES - PLEA OF GUILTY - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF PRIOR COUNSEL WHO PURPORTEDLY FAILED TO DISCUSS
THE CASE WITH DEFENDANT IN THE FOUR YEARS LEADING UP TO HIS
PLEA - WHETHER MOTION BY NEWLY APPOINTED COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW
THE PLEA SHOULD HAVE BEEN DECIDED AFTER A HEARING AS OPPOSED
TO A SUMMARY DISPOSITION; Supreme Court, Bronx County convicted defendant,
upon his guilty plea, of two counts of murder in the second degree, and sentenced him to
concurrent terms of 25 years to life; App. Div. affirmed.
MONROE (WILLIAM), PEOPLE v (89 AD3d 429):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 11/1/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Smith, J., 5/24/12; CRIMES - PLEA OF GUILTY - WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA -
WHETHER DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO WITHDRAW HIS GUILTY PLEA ON
THE GROUND THAT HIS PROMISED SENTENCE RAN CONCURRENTLY WITH
OTHER SENTENCES THAT WERE REDUCED BECAUSE THE PROMISE MADE
TO INDUCE THE PLEA CANNOT BE KEPT - APPLICATION OF PEOPLE v
PICHARDO (1 NY3d 126 [2003]) AND PEOPLE v ROWLAND (8 NY3d 342 [2007])
TO CASE INVOLVING RESENTENCING UNDER THE DRUG LAW REFORM ACT
(DLRA); ENTITLEMENT TO RESENTENCING ON CONVICTION FOR
CONSPIRACY; Supreme Court, New York County denied defendant's (1) CPL 440.10
motion to vacate a judgment convicting him, on his guilty plea, of conspiracy in the
second degree, and (2) CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing under the same conviction;
App. Div. affirmed.
For June 15, 2012 through June 21, 2012, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
ADRIAN, MATTER OF v BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
NIAGARA FALLS (92
AD3d 1272):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 2/17/12; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Court of
Appeals, 6/5/12; CIVIL SERVICE - TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT -
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT - CHALLENGE TO ADMINISTRATIVE
TERMINATION OF PETITIONER'S EMPLOYMENT FOR FAILURE TO SATISFY
SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENT THAT EMPLOYEES HIRED OR
PROMOTED AFTER A CERTAIN DATE RESIDE WITHIN THE CITY OF
NIAGARA FALLS; PETITIONER'S ENTITLEMENT TO HEARING PURSUANT TO
EDUCATION LAW §§ 3020 AND 3020-a; Supreme Court, Niagara County, among
other things, directed respondents to reinstate petitioner to her tenured employment with
the City School District of the City of Niagara Falls; App. Div. dismissed petitioner's
cross appeal, reversed the judgment, and dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.
BEZIO, MATTER OF v DORSEY (91 AD3d 1051):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 1/12/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by Court
of Appeals, 6/7/12; PRISONS AND PRISONERS - MEDICAL AND SURGICAL
TREATMENT - COURT-ORDERED FORCE FEEDING - WHETHER PRISON
INMATE ON VOLUNTARY HUNGER STRIKE HAD RIGHT TO DECLINE FORCE
FEEDING; Supreme Court, Washington County granted petitioner's application, in a
CPLR article 4 proceeding, to authorize the involuntary medical treatment and feeding of
respondent; App. Div. affirmed.
CHENANGO FORKS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MATTER OF v NEW YORK STATE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD (95 AD3d 1479):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 5/10/12; confirmation of determination, with dissents;
sua sponte examination whether the two-justice dissent is on a question of law; CIVIL
SERVICE - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FAIR EMPLOYMENT ACT (TAYLOR LAW)
REFUSAL TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH - WHETHER REIMBURSEMENT OF
MEDICARE PART B PREMIUMS IS A TERM AND CONDITION OF
EMPLOYMENT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY NEGOTIATION - ESTABLISHMENT
OF PAST PRACTICE OF MAKING SUCH REIMBURSEMENTS; App. Div. confirmed
determination by respondent Public Employment Relations Board, which found that
petitioner had committed an improper employer practice, and dismissed the CPLR article
78 petition.
JAMES v WORMUTH (93 AD3d 1290) (Appeal No. 2.):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 3/23/12; affirmance with dissents; PHYSICIANS
AND SURGEONS - MALPRACTICE - WIRE FRAGMENT KNOWINGLY LEFT IN
PATIENT'S BODY FOLLOWING SURGERY - WHETHER PLAINTIFF COULD
RELY ON DOCTRINE OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE
CASE OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE OR WAS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH THE
APPLICABLE STANDARD OF CARE AND THE BREACH THEREOF THROUGH
EXPERT MEDICAL TESTIMONY; Supreme Court, Onondaga County dismissed the
amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 4401; App. Div. affirmed.
THOMAS (CHESTER J.), PEOPLE v (85 AD3d 1572):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 6/10/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Lippman, Ch. J., 6/6/12; CRIMES - FAIR TRIAL - TRIAL COURT SUSTAINED
PEOPLE'S OBJECTION TO REMARK MADE BY DEFENSE COUNSEL ON
SUMMATION, URGING THE JURY TO INFER, FROM A POLICE OFFICER'S
FAILURE TO TESTIFY, THAT THE OFFICER'S TESTIMONY WOULD NOT HAVE
SUPPORTED THE COMPLAINANT'S TESTIMONY THAT SHE OMITTED FROM
HER WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE POLICE THAT HER LIVE-IN BOYFRIEND
HAD SODOMIZED HER BECAUSE THE OFFICER TOLD HER THAT NO JUDGE
WOULD BELIEVE HER; ALLEGED MOLINEUX VIOLATION; Monroe County Court
convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal sexual act in the first degree,
criminal contempt in the first degree and assault in the third degree; App. Div. affirmed.
CITY OF UTICA, MATTER OF v DAINES (95 AD3d 1467):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 5/10/12; reversal, with dissents; PROCEEDING
AGAINST BODY OR OFFICER - CERTIFICATION OF AMBULANCE SERVICES -
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW § 3000 - CHALLENGE TO APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER
CONCLUDING THAT DETERMINATION BY NEW YORK STATE EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL, WHICH DENIED MUNICIPALITY'S
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF ITS MUNICIPAL AMBULANCE
SERVICE, HAD TO BE ANNULLED BECAUSE IT DID NOT APPLY THE
"STRONG PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE APPLICATION"
REQUIRED BY PUBLIC HEALTH LAW § 3008(7)(b); Supreme Court, Albany County
dismissed petitioner City of Utica's application, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, to
review a determination of respondent New York State Emergency Medical Services
Council denying petitioner's application for a certificate of need for its ambulance
service; App. Div. reversed, annulled the determination of respondent New York State
Emergency Medical Services Council and granted the City of Utica's CPLR article 78
petition to that extent.
WORDEN (ROBERT L.), PEOPLE v (91 AD3d 1340):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 1/31/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 6/5/12; CRIMES - PLEA OF GUILTY - DENIAL OF MOTION SEEKING TO
WITHDRAW GUILTY PLEA BASED UPON COMPLAINANT'S RECANTATION -
DEFENDANT'S ENTITLEMENT TO A HEARING ON THE MOTION; WHETHER
DEFENDANT KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO GUILTY
PLEA; RIGHT TO COUNSEL - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL; Monroe County Court convicted defendant, upon his guilty plea, of rape in
the third degree; App. Div. affirmed.