Return to New Filings Page
For April 5, 2013 through April 11, 2013, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
ABNER (JESSE), PEOPLE v (101 AD3d 1628):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 12/21/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Court of Appeals, 3/26/13; CRIMES - RIGHT TO COUNSEL - EFFECTIVE
REPRESENTATION - SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION PROCEEDING - FAILURE
TO ARGUE THAT SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT (SORA) WAS
INAPPLICABLE TO SEX CRIME AS TO WHICH DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE
EXPIRED FIVE YEARS BEFORE THE ENACTMENT OF SORA; Erie County Court
determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to SORA; App. Div. affirmed.
BEATY (KATISHA), PEOPLE v (96 AD3d 1515):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 6/8/12; affirmance and grant of motion; leave to
appeal granted by Smith, J., 3/5/13; Rule 500.11 review pending; CRIMES - SENTENCE
- POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION (PRS) - TRIAL COURT'S ALLEGED FAILURE
TO ADVISE DEFENDANT REGARDING PRS; ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR NOT RAISING ISSUE OF
WHETHER PENAL LAW § 70.85 CAN BE APPLIED TO UPHOLD A GUILTY PLEA
THAT IS INVALID FOR FAILURE TO ADVISE DEFENDANT OF PRS
REQUIREMENTS (PEOPLE v CATU 4 NY3d 242); ANDERS BRIEF; Erie County
Court convicted defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced her to a
determinate term of 23 years; thereafter, the same court resentenced defendant to 23 years
without PRS; App. Div. affirmed the sentence and granted defense counsel's motion to be
relieved as assigned counsel.
BHUGRA v MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (2013 NY Slip Op
63975[U]):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 2/7/13; sua sponte examination whether the order
appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the Constitution and
whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as
of right; APPEAL - APPELLATE DIVISION - MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AT APPELLATE DIVISION; App. Div., in an appeal from
a 10/25/11 order of Supreme Court, New York County, granted appellant's motion to
strike the App. Div. Clerk's designation of the appeal as non-enumerated, to strike
respondents' brief, and for an enlargement of time to file appellant's reply brief only to the
extent of adjourning the perfected appeal to the March 2013 Term, and otherwise denied
the motion.
GONZALEZ (VICTOR), PEOPLE v:
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/10/11; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Lippman, Ch. J., 3/29/13; CRIMES - INSTRUCTIONS - WHETHER DEFENDANT'S
REQUEST FOR AN EXTREME EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE CHARGE BASED
ENTIRELY ON PROOF OFFERED BY THE PEOPLE IN THEIR DIRECT CASE, IS
PROPERLY DEEMED CPL 250.10(2) NOTICE OF THE DEFENDANT'S INTENT TO
PRESENT PSYCHIATRIC EVIDENCE, ENTITLING THE PEOPLE TO REOPEN
THEIR CASE AND PRESENT PSYCHIATRIC EVIDENCE; WHETHER TRIAL
COURT VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY
CONDITIONING A JURY INSTRUCTION TO WHICH HE WAS ENTITLED ON A
WAIVER OF HIS RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT; Supreme Court, Bronx County
convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree, and sentenced
him to a term of 25 years to life; App. Div. affirmed.
ODDONE (ANTHONY), PEOPLE v (89 AD3d 868):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 11/9/11; modification; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 3/29/13; CRIMES - WITNESSES - EXPERT WITNESS - WHETHER THE
APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT COUNTY COURT
PROPERLY DENIED, WITHOUT A FRYE HEARING, THE DEFENDANT'S
APPLICATION TO STRIKE THE TESTIMONY OF THE PEOPLE'S FORENSIC
PATHOLOGIST REGARDING THE CAUSE OF THE VICTIM'S DEATH - DENIAL
OF DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO PRESENT EXPERT TESTIMONY FROM
PSYCHOLOGIST ABOUT ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS ESTIMATIONS OF
DURATION OF EVENTS; EVIDENCE - PRIOR STATEMENT NOT ALLOWED TO
REFRESH WITNESS'S RECOLLECTION - CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO
CPL 60.35; SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE; ALLEGED JUROR BIAS;
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN SUMMATION; INTOXICATION -
WHETHER COUNTY COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO GIVE AN
INTOXICATION CHARGE TO THE JURY - PENAL LAW § 15.25; Suffolk County
Court convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of manslaughter in the first degree, and
sentenced him to a determinate term of 22 years of imprisonment with five years of
postrelease supervision; App. Div. modified by reducing the sentence imposed on the
conviction of manslaughter in the first degree from a determinate term of 22 years of
imprisonment with five years of postrelease supervision to a determinate term of 17 years
of imprisonment with five years postrelease supervision, and affirmed the judgment as so
modified.
SIBBLIES (MARSHA), PEOPLE v (98 AD3d 458):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 8/28/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Smith, J., 3/28/13; CRIMES - RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL - PEOPLE FILED AN OFF-
CALENDAR STATEMENT OF READINESS AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPEARED
IN COURT TO EXPLAIN THEY WERE NOT READY FOR TRIAL BECAUSE THEY
HAD NOT YET RECEIVED MEDICAL RECORDS - WHETHER PEOPLE'S
ORIGINAL STATEMENT OF READINESS WAS ILLUSORY AND WHETHER
DENIAL OF DEFENDANT'S CPL 30.30 MOTION TO DISMISS VIOLATED HER
RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL; Supreme Court, Bronx County convicted defendant,
after a jury trial, of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and
resisting arrest, and sentenced her to a conditional discharge for a period of one year;
App. Div. affirmed.
TEAGUE (EAMON), MATTER OF:
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 2/6/13; sua sponte examination whether the order
appealed from finally determines the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution
and whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal
as of right; ATTORNEY AND CLIENT - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS -
APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER DENYING MOTION TO, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, PRECLUDE DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE FROM
OFFERING ANY EVIDENCE AT HEARING, INCLUDING SUPPRESSION OF
TRANSCRIPT OF EXAMINATION UNDER OATH; App. Div. denied attorney's
motion for, among other things, an order precluding the Departmental Disciplinary
Committee from offering any evidence at a hearing scheduled to commence January 16,
2013, including suppression of the transcript of an examination under oath.
For April 12, 2013 through April 18, 2013, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
DOCKERY (ALEXANDER), PEOPLE v (2012 NY Slip Op 76557[U]):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 6/21/12; leave to appeal granted by Pigott, J., 4/10/13;
CRIMES - RIGHT TO COUNSEL - DISMISSAL OF APPEAL FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE - WHETHER DEFENDANT, WHO WAS 16 YEARS OLD AT THE
TIME OF CONVICTION, WAS ENTITLED TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN
APPLYING FOR POOR PERSON RELIEF AND ASSIGNMENT OF COUNSEL -
TWENTY YEAR DELAY BETWEEN FILING OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL BY
TRIAL COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT'S ATTEMPT TO PURSUE THE APPEAL;
Supreme Court, New York County convicted defendant of robbery in the first and second
degrees and sentenced him to 2 to 6 years; App. Div. granted the People's motion for an
order dismissing the appeal and dismissed the appeal.
GALINDO (OLIVERIO), PEOPLE v (101 AD3d 408):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 12/4/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J. 4/5/13; CRIMES - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - WHETHER STATUTORY
PRESUMPTION OF INTENT TO USE WEAPON UNLAWFULLY AGAINST
ANOTHER IN PENAL LAW § 265.15(4) APPLIES TO CHARGE OF CRIMINAL
POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE SECOND DEGREE (PENAL LAW §
265.03[1][b][3]) WHERE DEFENDANT ACCIDENTALLY SHOT HIS COUSIN IN
THE LEG; CLAIMED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL; Supreme Court,
New York County convicted defendant of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon
in the second degree, and sentenced him to concurrent terms of 4 years; App. Div.
affirmed.
QBE INSURANCE CORP. v JINX-PROOF, INC. (102 AD3d 508):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 1/17/13; modification; leave to appeal granted by
App. Div., 4/11/13; INSURANCE - DUTY TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY -
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY CONTAINING AN ASSAULT
AND BATTERY EXCLUSION - WHETHER LETTERS FROM INSURER THAT
CONTAINED "RESERVATION OF RIGHTS" LANGUAGE CONSTITUTED VALID
NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER OF COVERAGE WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSAULT
AND BATTERY EXCLUSION - WHETHER INSURER WAS ESTOPPED FROM
DISCLAIMING COVERAGE; Supreme Court, New York County granted plaintiff's
motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend defendant Jinx-
Proof, Inc. in the underlying action, and denied Jinx-Proof's motion for summary
judgment dismissing the complaint against it; App. Div. modified to declare that plaintiff
is not obligated to defend Jinx-Proof in the underlying action, and otherwise affirmed.
SAGE (MERLIN G.), PEOPLE v (98 AD3d 1254):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 9/28/12; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Smith, J., 4/10/13; CRIMES - INSTRUCTIONS - WHETHER TRIAL COURT ERRED
IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR A CHARGE TO THE JURY THAT
THE PEOPLE'S KEY WITNESS WAS AN ACCOMPLICE; Monroe County Court
convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of manslaughter in the first degree; App. Div.
affirmed.
SATO v IPPUDO NY (104
AD3d 423):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 3/7/13; reversal with two-Justice dissent; Rule 500.11
review pending; NEGLIGENCE - MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES - PROXIMATE
CAUSE - ALLEGED DEFECTIVE CONDITION OF STAIRWAY - PLAINTIFF FELL
DOWN A FLIGHT OF STAIRS IN DEFENDANT'S RESTAURANT - WHETHER
THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT; Supreme Court,
New York County denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint; App. Div. reversed, granted the motion, dismissed the complaint and directed
the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
SMART (FLOYD L.), PEOPLE v (100 AD3d 1473):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 11/16/12; modification; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 4/4/13; CRIMES - RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION - WHETHER THE TRIAL
COURT ERRED IN PERMITTING ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF WITNESS'S
GRAND JURY TESTIMONY ON THE BASIS THAT THE WITNESS WAS
UNAVAILABLE DUE TO MISCONDUCT OF THE DEFENDANT - WITNESS
APPEARED IN COURT AND ASSERTED HER FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT
AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION; ALLEGED IMPROPER HANDLING OF JUROR
QUESTIONS DURING DELIBERATIONS; Monroe County Court convicted defendant,
after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree; App. Div. modified by reducing the
sentence imposed to an indeterminate term of 15 years to life, and affirmed as modified.
STATE OF NEW YORK, MATTER OF v JOHN S. (104 AD3d 511):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 3/14/13; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
CRIMES - SEX OFFENDERS - CIVIL COMMITMENT OR SUPERVISION -
ALLEGED DUE PROCESS VIOLATION BY INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE
REGARDING SEXUAL OFFENSE ALLEGATIONS FROM THIRTY TO FORTY
YEARS AGO AND EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY BASED ON SUCH
EVIDENCE - RELEASE OF RECORDS PREVIOUSLY SEALED; SUFFICIENCY OF
THE EVIDENCE; Supreme Court, New York County, upon a jury verdict that respondent
suffers from a mental abnormality, determined that respondent is a dangerous sex
offender requiring confinement; App. Div. affirmed.
STENROOS v MAECKER:
Chautauqua County Court order of 4/3/13; affirmance; sua sponte examination
whether an appeal as of right may be taken to the Court of Appeals, pursuant to CPLR
5601(b), from an order of County Court sitting as an appellate court; LANDLORD AND
TENANT - EVICTION - DEFENDANT WITH RIGHT OF POSSESSION OF REAL
PROPERTY UNLESS THERE WAS A DEFAULT IN MAKING MORTGAGE
PAYMENTS; ALLEGED DUE PROCESS AND JUDICIAL BIAS ISSUES; Silver
Creek Village Court judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $10,214.28,
with warrant of eviction against defendant for nonpayment; County Court affirmed.
WELLS (DIANE), PEOPLE v (36 Misc 3d 144(A)):
App. Term, 1st Dept. order of 8/14/12; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Smith,
J., 4/13/13; CRIMES - RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL - EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS
- TIME RESULTING FROM AN APPEAL (CPL 30.30 [4][a]) - WHETHER THE
EXCLUDABLE TIME RESULTING FROM AN APPEAL ENDED WHEN THE
COURT OF APPEALS DENIED THE PEOPLE'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
APPEAL, OR WHETHER IT ENDED ON THE LATER DATE TO WHICH THE
TRIAL COURT HAD ORDERED A ROUTINE ADJOURNMENT PENDING THE
DECISION ON THE PEOPLE'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL; Criminal
Court of the City of New York granted defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory
instrument pursuant to CPL 30.30 (10/7/10 order); upon reconsideration, the same court
adhered to the original determination (2/22/11 order); thereafter, the same court corrected
a factual error in the 2/22/11 order and adhered to the determination therein (3/22/11
order); App. Term reversed the 10/7/10 order, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the
accusatory instrument, reinstated the accusatory instrument, and dismissed as academic
the appeals from the 2/22/11 and 3/22/11 orders.