Return to New Filings Page
For April 15, 2016 through April 21, 2016, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
BAUTISTA (VILMA), PEOPLE v (132 AD3d 523):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 10/20/15; modification; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 4/5/16; CRIMES - ARGUMENT AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL -
PROSECUTOR'S ARGUMENT ON SUMMATION - WHETHER DEFENDANT WAS
DEPRIVED OF A FAIR TRIAL BY THE PROSECUTOR'S ALLEGED
MISSTATEMENT OF THE EVIDENCE; DISCLOSURE - FAILURE TO DISCLOSE
EXCULPATORY MATERIAL - WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION
CORRECTLY HELD THAT AN INVESTIGATOR'S NOTES FROM AN INTERVIEW
WITH A COCONSPIRATOR DID NOT CONSTITUTE BRADY MATERIAL;
EVIDENCE - JUDICIAL NOTICE - FACT FINDINGS OF FOREIGN COUNTRY
COURT IMPROPERLY READ TO JURY - WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION
CORRECTLY HELD THAT THE TRIAL COURT'S ERROR IN READING THE
FACT FINDINGS OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY COURT TO THE JURY WAS
HARMLESS AS TO THE TAX COUNTS; Supreme Court, New York County, convicted
defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal tax fraud in the first degree, offering a false
instrument for filing in the first degree, and conspiracy in the fourth degree, and
sentenced her to concurrent terms of 2 to 6 years, 1 to 3 years, and 1 year, respectively,
and restitution in the amount of $3,557,620; App. Div. modified to the extent of vacating
the conspiracy conviction and remanding for a new trial on that count if the People be so
advised, and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5) as to the remaining
convictions, and otherwise affirmed.
FRIEDMAN, MATTER OF v RICE (134 AD3d 826):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 12/9/15; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Court of
Appeals, 4/5/16; RECORDS - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW (FOIL) -
EXEMPTIONS - STATEMENTS OF NONTESTIFYING WITNESSES - WHETHER
THE APPELLATE DIVISION PROPERLY DETERMINED THAT DOCUMENTS
SOUGHT BY PETITIONER WERE EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW § 87(2)(e)(iii); GRAND JURY - INSPECTION OF GRAND
JURY MINUTES - WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION CORRECTLY HELD
THAT PETITIONER FAILED TO ESTABLISH A COMPELLING AND
PARTICULARIZED NEED FOR DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY MATERIALS
PURSUANT TO CPL 190.25(4); Supreme Court, Nassau County, in a CPLR article 78
proceeding to compel production of certain documents pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Law (FOIL) and CPL 190.25(4), granted the petition and directed the Nassau
County District Attorney to disclose the subject documents, with certain redactions; App.
Div. reversed, denied the petition and dismissed the CPLR article 78 proceeding.
KELLY, MATTER OF v DiNAPOLI (137 AD3d 1470):
3rd Dept. App. Div. judgment of 3/24/16; confirmation of determination and
dismissal of petition; Rule 500.11 review pending; CIVIL SERVICE - RETIREMENT
AND PENSION BENEFITS - ACCIDENTAL DISABILITY RETIREMENT -
WHETHER THE APPELLATE DIVISION CORRECTLY HELD THAT
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE COMPTROLLER'S
DETERMINATION THAT PETITIONER'S INJURY DID NOT RESULT FROM AN
"ACCIDENT" WITHIN THE MEANING OF RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY
LAW § 363 AND, THEREFORE, PETITIONER WAS NOT ENTITLED TO
ACCIDENTAL DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS; App. Div. confirmed
respondent's determination denying petitioner's application for accidental disability
retirement benefits, and dismissed the petition.
MINEMIER (KEVIN M.), PEOPLE v (134 AD3d 1551):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 12/31/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Stein, J. 4/12/16; CRIMES - SENTENCE - YOUTHFUL OFFENDER - DENIAL OF
YOUTHFUL OFFENDER STATUS - COURT'S FAILURE TO STATE REASONS
FOR DENIAL OR TO DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION - WHETHER
THE APPELLATE DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT, UNDER PEOPLE v
RUDOLPH (21 NY3d 497 [2013]), CPL 720.20(1) DOES NOT REQUIRE THE
SENTENCING COURT TO STATE ITS REASONS FOR DENYING YOUTHFUL
OFFENDER STATUS TO A DEFENDANT; WHETHER THE APPELLATE
DIVISION ERRED IN HOLDING THAT, UNDER CPL 390.50, DEFENDANT WAS
NOT ENTITLED TO DISCLOSURE OF ANY INFORMATION IN A DOCUMENT
INCLUDED WITH THE PRE-SENTENCE REPORT ON THE BASIS THAT THE
SOURCE OF THE INFORMATION WAS PROMISED CONFIDENTIALITY; County
Court, Monroe County, convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder
in the second degree, two counts of assault in the first degree, and assault in the second
degree; App. Div. affirmed.
NERONI v FOLLENDER (137 AD3d 1336):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/3/16; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
DISMISSAL AND NONSUIT - DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT - COMPLAINT IN
FRAUD ACTION - WHETHER SUPREME COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING
PLAINTIFF'S ACTION, SANCTIONING PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY FOR FRIVOLOUS
CONDUCT AND ENJOINING PLAINTIFF FROM BRINGING FURTHER
LITIGATION AGAINST DEFENDANTS; Supreme Court, Delaware County, among
other things, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint; in a separate order,
Supreme Court, among other things, partially granted defendants' cross motion and
directed plaintiff to pay costs and counsel fees; App. Div. affirmed both orders.
For April 22, 2016 through April 28, 2016, the following preliminary appeal statements
were filed:
EATON v HUNGERFORD (137 AD3d 1614):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 3/18/16; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether
a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
CIVIL RIGHTS - DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT - DISCRIMINATION
BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION - WHETHER PLAINTIFFS RAISED A
TRIABLE ISSUE OF FACT THAT THEY WERE SUBJECT TO AN ADVERSE
EMPLOYMENT ACTION OR HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT; DEFAMATION;
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; Supreme Court, Monroe
County, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint;
App. Div. affirmed.
ESTREMERA (ROBERTO), PEOPLE v (134 AD3d 655):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 12/29/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Fahey, J., 4/6/16; CRIMES - SENTENCE - RESENTENCE - WHETHER SUPREME
COURT ERRED IN CONDUCTING A POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION
RESENTENCING PURSUANT TO PENAL LAW § 70.85 WITHOUT DEFENDANT
PRESENT; Supreme Court, New York County, reimposed defendant's original prison
sentence pursuant to Penal Law § 70.85 without imposing a period of postrelease
supervision; App. Div. affirmed.
FAGAN (KEITH), PEOPLE v (134 AD3d 411):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 12/1/15; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Pigott, J., 4/12/16; CRIMES - SENTENCE - RESENTENCE - SECOND VIOLENT
FELONY OFFENDER - RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF PEOPLE v CATU (4
NY3d 242 [2005]) - WHETHER DEFENDANT'S 2000 CONVICTION BY GUILTY
PLEA WAS OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF HIS FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS AND THEREFORE COULD NOT BE USED FOR PREDICATE FELONY
PURPOSES WITHIN THE MEANING OF CPL 400.15 WHERE DEFENDANT WAS
NOT ADVISED AT THE TIME OF THAT PLEA THAT THE SENTENCE WOULD
INCLUDE POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION; Supreme Court, Bronx County,
resentenced defendant, upon remand from the App. Div., as a second violent felony
offender, to a term of 15 years, and then denied the People's CPL 440.40 motion to set
aside the judgment of resentencing; App. Div. affirmed.
MANKO v LENOX HILL HOSPITAL (2014 NY Slip Op 91312[U]):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 12/1/14; denial of motion; sua sponte examination
whether the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution and whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to
support an appeal as of right; APPEAL - APPELLATE DIVISION - DENIAL OF
MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEALS AND VACATE VARIOUS APPELLATE
DIVISION ORDERS; App. Div. denied appellant's motion to, among other things,
reinstate appeals from 5/18/12 and 10/7/11 Supreme Court, Kings County, orders and to
recall and vacate four App. Div. orders dated 3/27/13, 7/5/13, 7/29/13 and 10/9/13.
MONTE, PEOPLE ex rel., v MINGO:
Supreme Court, New York County, order of 3/29/16; denial of petition; HABEAS
CORPUS - SUPREME COURT ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS; Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and
dismissed the writ.
OATES v NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (— AD3d —, 2016 NY Slip Op
02729):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 4/12/16; affirmance with two-Justice dissent;
NEGLIGENCE - SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH THAT BUS
DRIVER WAS NEGLIGENT IN OPERATING A BUS THAT HIT AND KILLED A
WOMAN WHILE PULLING OUT OF A BUS STOP - SUFFICIENCY OF THE
EVIDENCE UNDER THE NOSEWORTHY DOCTRINE; EXPERT TESTIMONY -
SUFFICIENCY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY TO ESTABLISH THAT DECEDENT
ENDURED CONSCIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING PRIOR TO HER DEATH;
Supreme Court, Bronx County, upon a jury verdict, awarded plaintiffs $300,000 for
decedent Rachel Levy's conscious pain and suffering; $150,000 for plaintiff Hadassah
Levy's past loss of custodial services, and $400,000 for her future loss of custodial
services; and $100,000 for plaintiff Miriam Levy Oates's future loss of nurture, care and
guidance; App. Div. affirmed.