Return to New Filings Page
For December 6, 2013 through December 12, 2013, the following preliminary
appeal statements were filed:
CAPPON, MATTER OF v CARBALLADA (109 AD3d 1115):
4th Dept. App. Div. order of 9/27/13; reversal; sua sponte examination whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
PROCEEDING AGAINST BODY OR OFFICER - CPLR ARTICLE 78 PROCEEDING
TO ANNUL RESPONDENT'S DETERMINATION THAT HE VIOLATED
ROCHESTER CITY CODE § 90-16(a)(2)(d) WHICH REQUIRES OWNERS OF
RENTAL PROPERTIES TO OBTAIN A VALID CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(CO) WITHIN A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OR
TERMINATION OF AN EXISTING CO; Supreme Court, Monroe County granted the
petition; App. Div. reversed and dismissed the petition.
GONZALES (JOHN), PEOPLE v (111 AD3d 147):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 10/2/13; reversal with dissents; leave to appeal
granted by Angiolillo, J., 11/25/13; sua sponte examination whether the App. Div. order
of reversal "was on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the
determination of law, would not have led to reversal" (CPL 450.90[2][a]); CRIMES -
ARREST - WARRANTLESS ARREST OF DEFENDANT WHO OPENED HIS
APARTMENT DOOR TO SEE WHO WAS KNOCKING AND TRIED TO CLOSE IT
WHEN HE SAW IT WAS THE POLICE; Supreme Court, Queens County, convicted
defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first degree, and imposed sentence;
App. Div. reversed, granted that branch of defendant's omnibus motion which was to
suppress his statements to law enforcement officials, and ordered a new trial.
HEMPHILL v STATE OF NEW YORK:
Court of Claims judgment of 10/25/13; dismissal; sua sponte examination whether
there is a basis for a direct appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601(b)(2); STATE - CLAIM
AGAINST STATE - ACTION TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL
CONFINEMENT AND INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
ARISING FROM CLAIMANT'S ALLEGED 14-DAY CONFINEMENT TO HIS
PRISON CELL PENDING DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN DISCIPLINARY CHARGES;
PRISONS AND PRISONERS; Court of Claims dismissed the claim.
For December 13, 2013 through December 19, 2013, the following preliminary
appeal statements were filed:
CANGRO v ROSADO (111 AD3d 422):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 11/7/13; dismissal of appeal; sua sponte examination
whether the order appealed from finally determines the action within the meaning of the
Constitution and whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to
support an appeal as of right; APPEAL - CHALLENGE TO APPELLATE DIVISION
ORDER THAT, AMONG OTHER THINGS, DISMISSED PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL
FROM A SUPREME COURT ORDER DENYING REARGUMENT; Supreme Court,
New York County, denied plaintiff's motion for reargument of the parties' respective
motions for summary judgment; App. Div. dismissed the appeal and enjoined plaintiff
from commencing any litigation or making any motions against defendant without the
prior permission of the appropriate administrative judge.
GOLDMAN (ARON), PEOPLE v (110 AD3d 216):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 9/24/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Graffeo, J., 12/9/13; CRIMES - ENTERPRISE CORRUPTION - MEDICAL CLINIC
USED TO FACILITATE INSURANCE FRAUD - LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF THE
EVIDENCE - WHETHER THE "CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE" DEFINED IN PENAL
LAW § 460.10(3) MUST BE STRUCTURED SO AS TO PERMIT THE ENTERPRISE
TO CONTINUE IN EXISTENCE WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF ONE OR
MORE KEY PARTICIPANTS; INSTRUCTIONS - ACCESSORIAL LIABILITY -
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON ACCESSORIAL
LIABILITY CONVEYED THE APPROPRIATE LEGAL STANDARD; RIGHT TO
COUNSEL - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL FOR
FAILING TO PRESERVE CERTAIN ISSUES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW; Supreme
Court, New York County, after a joint jury trial with defendant Matthew Keschner,
convicted defendant Goldman of enterprise corruption, scheme to defraud in the first
degree, two counts of grand larceny in the first degree, money laundering in the first and
second degrees, five counts of insurance fraud in the third degree, three counts of
insurance fraud in the fourth degree, and one count of falsifying business records in the
first degree, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
KESCHNER (MATTHEW), PEOPLE v (110 AD3d 216):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 9/24/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Graffeo, J., 12/9/13; CRIMES - ENTERPRISE CORRUPTION - MEDICAL CLINIC
USED TO FACILITATE INSURANCE FRAUD - LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF THE
EVIDENCE - WHETHER THE "CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE" DEFINED IN PENAL
LAW § 460.10(3) MUST BE STRUCTURED SO AS TO PERMIT THE ENTERPRISE
TO CONTINUE IN EXISTENCE WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF ONE OR
MORE KEY PARTICIPANTS; INSTRUCTIONS - ACCESSORIAL LIABILITY -
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON ACCESSORIAL
LIABILITY CONVEYED THE APPROPRIATE LEGAL STANDARD; RIGHT TO
COUNSEL - ALLEGED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL FOR
FAILING TO PRESERVE CERTAIN ISSUES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW; Supreme
Court, New York County, after a joint jury trial with defendant Aron Goldman, convicted
defendant Keschner of enterprise corruption, scheme to defraud in the first degree, two
counts of grand larceny in the first degree, money laundering in the second degree, four
counts of insurance fraud in the fourth degree, and two counts of falsifying business
records in the first degree, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
For December 20, 2013 through December 26, 2013, the following preliminary
appeal statements were filed:
BECKER, MATTER OF v COMMISSIONER OF LABOR (2013 NY Slip Op
87327[U]):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 10/4/13; denial of motion; sua sponte examination
whether the order appealed from finally determines the proceeding within the meaning of
the Constitution and whether any jurisdictional basis exists to support an appeal as of
right; APPEAL - APPELLATE DIVISION - DENIAL OF MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION; App. Div. denied motion for reconsideration.
CONASON v MEGAN HOLDING, LLC (109 AD3d 724):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 9/24/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by App.
Div., 12/12/13; LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - FOUR-YEAR STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS (CPLR 213-a) - RENT OVERCHARGE - WHETHER APPELLATE
DIVISION ERRED IN RULING THAT THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS NOT A
BAR WHERE SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE OF FRAUD EXISTS ON THE RECORD;
ESTOPPEL - COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL - WHETHER SUPREME COURT
CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT DEFENDANTS WERE COLLATERALLY
ESTOPPED FROM ARGUING THAT FRAUD DID NOT EXIST; CORPORATIONS -
DISREGARDING CORPORATE ENTITY - WHETHER SUPREME COURT ERRED
IN PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL; Supreme Court, New York County, among
other things, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability and denied
defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; App. Div. affirmed.
CURTIS-SHANLEY v BANK OF AMERICA (109 AD3d 634; 2013
NY Slip Op 89548[U]):
2nd Dept. App. Div. orders of 10/25/13 and 8/28/13; denial of motion for, among
other things, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals (10/25/13 order) and affirmance
(8/28/13 order); sua sponte examination whether the orders appealed from finally
determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
BANKS AND BANKING - ACTION SEEKING DAMAGES FOR BANK'S REFUSAL
TO APPROVE APPLICATION FOR LETTER OF CREDIT; SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
ALLEGED DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS IN APPELLATE PROCESS; Supreme
Court, Westchester County, denied plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to execute a
certificate of readiness for trial and, in a separate order, granted defendant's motion for
summary judgment dismissing the complaint; App. Div. affirmed and thereafter denied
plaintiff's motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
DUBARRY (DARIUS), PEOPLE v (107 AD3d 822):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 6/12/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by
Lippman, Ch. J., 12/11/13; CRIMES - MURDER - DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE
MURDER - JUSTIFICATION DEFENSE - SUBMISSION OF INTENTIONAL
MURDER AND DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE MURDER COUNTS TO THE JURY
IN THE CONJUNCTIVE, RATHER THAN IN THE ALTERNATIVE; WITNESSES -
UNAVAILABILITY OF WITNESS - WHETHER THE PEOPLE ESTABLISHED BY
CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANT'S MISCONDUCT
PROCURED WITNESS'S UNAVAILABILITY; Supreme Court, Kings County,
convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of murder in the second degree,
attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second
degree, and imposed sentence; App. Div. affirmed.
GUILLORY, MATTER OF v FISCHER (110 AD3d 1426):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 10/31/13; affirmance; sua sponte examination
whether a substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as
of right; PRISONS AND PRISONERS - DISCIPLINE OF INMATE - SMUGGLING
AND POSSESSION OF AN ARTICLE THE USE OR POSSESSION OF WHICH IS
PROHIBITED - TOBACCO; Supreme Court, Chemung County, dismissed petitioner's
application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of
respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules; App.
Div. affirmed.
MORGAN, MATTER OF (ROCHESTER—PACHECO) (2013 NY Slip Op
92473[U]):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 11/26/13; denial of motion; sua sponte examination
whether the order appealed from finally determines the proceeding within the meaning of
the Constitution; APPEAL - APPELLATE DIVISION - DENIAL OF MOTION FOR
POOR PERSON AND OTHER RELIEF; App. Div. denied appellant Veronica Pacheco's
motion for, among other things, leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, leave to
have the appeal heard on the original record and upon a reproduced appellant's brief, and
removal of the current guardian(s).
SHIPLEY v CITY OF NEW YORK (105 AD3d 936):
2nd Dept. App. Div. order of 4/17/13; reversal; leave to appeal granted by Court of
Appeals, 12/12/13; DEAD BODIES - RIGHT OF SEPULCHER - RELEASE OF
DECEDENT'S BODY BY MEDICAL EXAMINER'S OFFICE WITHOUT
NOTIFICATION TO NEXT OF KIN THAT DECEDENT'S BRAIN HAD BEEN
REMOVED AND RETAINED FOR FURTHER EXAMINATION; Supreme Court,
Richmond County, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint; App. Div. modified by granting that branch of defendants' motion which was
for summary judgment dismissing so much of the first cause of action as was to recover
damages for unauthorized withholding, mutilation, and display of their son's body parts at
the Medical Examiner's Office; Supreme Court awarded $1 million in damages to
plaintiffs; App. Div. reversed and remitted for a new trial on damages, unless plaintiffs
served and filed a stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of damages from $1
million to $600,000 and to entry of an amended judgment reflecting such stipulation, and,
in the event that plaintiffs' so stipulate, affirmed the judgment as so reduced and
amended; Supreme Court, in a second amended judgment, awarded plaintiffs damages of
$600,000.
STATE OF NEW YORK, MATTER OF v CHARADA T. (107 AD3d 528):
1st Dept. App. Div. order of 6/18/13; affirmance; leave to appeal granted by Court
of Appeals, 12/10/13; CRIMES - SEX OFFENDERS - CIVIL COMMITMENT OR
SUPERVISION - WHETHER SUPREME COURT ERRED IN ADMITTING
TESTIMONY REGARDING AN UNCHARGED SEXUAL ASSAULT - EXPERT
WITNESS TESTIMONY ABOUT AND RELIANCE UPON HEARSAY EVIDENCE;
Supreme Court, New York County, upon a jury finding of mental abnormality, and upon a
finding made after a dispositional hearing that respondent is a dangerous sex offender
requiring confinement, committed him to a secure treatment facility; App. Div. affirmed.
STERNE, MATTER OF v COMMISSIONER OF LABOR (104 AD3d 984):
3rd Dept. App. Div. order of 3/7/13; affirmance; sua sponte examination whether a
substantial constitutional question is directly involved to support an appeal as of right;
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - BENEFITS - RECOVERY OF OVERPAYMENTS
- WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATIONS; App. Div. affirmed a decision of the
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which, among other things, ruled that claimant
made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits.