People v Rodriguez
2023 NY Slip Op 02390 [216 AD3d 436]
May 4, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 5, 2023


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Angelo Rodriguez, Appellant.

Mark W. Zeno, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Alma D. Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jennifer Mitchell of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Curtis J. Farber, J., at speedy trial motion; Laura A. Ward, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered January 22, 2019, as amended June 29, 2021, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant forfeited review of his speedy trial claim by pleading guilty (see People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940 [1982]). "Defendant was convicted before the effective date of the current version of CPL 30.30 (6), which prospectively permits defendants who pleaded guilty to raise statutory speedy trial claims on appeal, but which is not retroactive" (People v Hall, 210 AD3d 482, 483 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 1078 [2023]; see People v Lara-Medina, 195 AD3d 542 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 993 [2021]). Neither People v Acosta (189 AD3d 508, 508 [2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1094 [2021]) nor People v Person (184 AD3d 447 [2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1069 [2020]), require a contrary result because those cases only addressed the issue of waivability and not retroactivity. In any event, we find that defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied.

We perceive no basis for further reducing the resentence. Concur—Webber, J.P., Gesmer, González, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ.