| People v Panton |
| 2016 NY Slip Op 05181 [27 NY3d 1144] |
| June 30, 2016 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, September 7, 2016 |
| The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadine Panton, Appellant. |
Argued June 2, 2016; decided June 30, 2016
People v Panton, 114 AD3d 450, affirmed.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Peter D. Coddington and T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post-{**27 NY3d at 1145}Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did [*2]not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.