People v Kasse
2014 NY Slip Op 02103 [22 NY3d 1142]
March 27, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 7, 2014


[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Harouna Kasse, Appellant.

Decided March 27, 2014

People v Kasse, 40 Misc 3d 126(A), 2013 NY Slip Op 51022(U), affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Michael J. McLaughlin of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Sheryl Feldman of counsel), for respondent.

{**22 NY3d at 1143} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

The misdemeanor complaint was jurisdictionally valid because it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant engaged in [*2]unlicensed general vending in violation of section 20-453 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. The arresting police officer observed defendant at a specified time and public location standing behind a suitcase with more than 10 handbags, which he offered for sale to various individuals, and defendant failed to produce a vendor's license at the officer's request. Those allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes since they provided adequate notice to enable defendant to prepare a defense and invoke his protection against double jeopardy (see e.g. People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, 103 [2010]; People v Allen, 92 NY2d 378, 385 [1998]).{**22 NY3d at 1144}

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.