[*1]
Landis v Fusion
2009 NY Slip Op 50033(U) [22 Misc 3d 127(A)]
Decided on January 8, 2009
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on January 8, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : RUDOLPH, P.J., MOLIA and SCHEINKMAN, JJ
2007-1820 W C.

Paul Landis, Appellant,

against

Hudson Fusion/KELLY BRIGGS and CINDY PENCHINA, Respondents.


Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Village of Ossining, Westchester County (Andrew N. Grass, Jr., J.), entered September 28, 2007. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.


Judgment reversed without costs and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.

In this small claims action by plaintiff to recover monies deposited with defendants pursuant to a contract, the court, after a nonjury trial, found in favor of defendants and dismissed the action. We are unable to determine from the scanty record whether there was a breach of contract as contended by plaintiff on this appeal.

The record is insufficient to allow a determination as to whether defendants were performing in accordance with the contract at the time it was rescinded without any apparent agreement relating to the disposition of the deposit. Assuming that defendants were not in breach of contract, the record is also insufficient to allow a determination as to whether the amount defendants sought to retain from plaintiff's deposit for work allegedly performed was appropriate. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the court below for a new trial.

Rudolph, P.J., Molia and Scheinkman, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: January 08, 2009