Matter of David J.B. v Monique H. |
2008 NY Slip Op 05786 [52 AD3d 414] [52 AD3d 414] |
June 26, 2008 |
Appellate Division, First Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
In the Matter of David J.B., Appellant, v Monique H., Respondent. |
—[*1]
Anne Reiniger, New York, for respondent.
Carol Sherman, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Barbara H. Dildine of counsel), Law
Guardian.
"It is well established that in reviewing relocation and other custody issues, deference is to be accorded to the determination rendered by the factfinder, unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record" (Yolanda R. v Eugene I. G., 38 AD3d 288, 289 [2007]). Here, the record shows that in considering the custody and relocation issues, the court properly considered the "best interests" of the children (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 739-741 [1996]), and a preponderance of the evidence supports the court's award of custody to respondent mother, including permitting her to remain in Florida with the children. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.