Pelletier v Lahm
2014 NY Slip Op 07011 [24 NY3d 966]
October 16, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 26, 2014


[*1]
Jason Pelletier, Appellant,
v
Brittany Lahm et al., Respondents.

Decided October 16, 2014

Pelletier v Lahm, 111 AD3d 807, affirmed.

{**24 NY3d at 968} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered as unnecessary. The Appellate Division did not err in concluding that the giving of the emergency doctrine charge was proper because "[i]t was for the jury to find whether [defendant driver] was faced with a sudden and unforeseen emergency not of her own making and, if so, whether her response to the situation was that of a reasonably prudent person" (111 AD3d 807, 809 [2d Dept 2013]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.