Matter of Floyd v City of New York |
2013 NY Slip Op 03772 [106 AD3d 623] |
May 28, 2013 |
Appellate Division, First Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
In the Matter of Gregory Floyd, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Lillian Roberts et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Tom Klein, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Michael Bilello, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of John T. Ahern et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Gene DeMartino, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of John Murphy, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. |
—[*1]
Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine LLP, Melville (Marty Glennon of counsel), for Gregory Floyd, respondent.
Mary J. O'Connell, New York (Steven E. Skyes of counsel), for Lillian Roberts, James Tucciarelli, Kyle Simmons, Mark Rosenthal, Manuel Roman, Michael Coppola, Jon Bailey, Anthony Carter and Cornell Heyward, respondents.
Broach & Stulberg, LLP, New York (Robert B. Stulberg of counsel), for Tom Klein and Michael Bilello, respondents.
Green Burzichelli Greenberg, P.C., Lake Success (Harry Greenberg of counsel), for John T. Ahern, Sean Fitzpatrick, Stephen Melish, Joseph Colangelo and Augustino Martiniello, respondents.
Lichten & Bright, P.C., New York (Stuart Lichten of counsel), for Gene DeMartino, respondent.
Colleran, O'Hara & Mills L.L.P., Garden City (Carol O'Rourke Pennington of counsel), for John [*2]Murphy, respondent.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 11, 2012, July 24, 2012, and July 26, 2012, annulling mayoral personnel orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2, dated April 11, 2012, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Pursuant to the subject mayoral personnel orders, the City issued rules reclassifying ungraded civil service titles subject to prevailing wage bargaining under Labor Law § 220 as graded workers subject to bargaining under the New York City Collective Bargaining Law without complying with the procedures mandated by Civil Service Law § 20, i.e., notice, a public hearing, and approval by the State Civil Service Commission, which are applicable to those rules (see Matter of Corrigan v Joseph, 304 NY 172, 185 [1952], cert denied 345 US 924 [1953]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 31770(U).]