Solano v City of New York
2010 NY Slip Op 07612 [77 AD3d 571]
October 26, 2010
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010


Frank Solano, Appellant,
v
City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[*1] Raymond Schwartzberg & Associates, PLLC, New York (Raymond B. Schwartzberg of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Charles J. Siegel, New York (Jack L. Cohen of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered October 6, 2009, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and granted defendant Great American Construction Corp.'s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action as against it, unanimously modified, on the law, to award summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action as against the City, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

As the plywood plank that struck plaintiff had been deliberately dropped from a window it does not constitute a "falling object" under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Roberts v General Elec. Co., 97 NY2d 737, 738 [2002]; see also Boyle v 42nd St. Dev. Project, Inc., 38 AD3d 404, 407 [2007]). Accordingly, the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action should be dismissed as against the City as well as against Great American (see Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 111 [1984]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.