HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Cherry |
2007 NY Slip Op 52378(U) [18 Misc 3d 1102(A)] |
Decided on December 17, 2007 |
Supreme Court, Kings County |
Schack, J. |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
HSBC Bank USA,
N.A., as Indenture Trustee For the Registered Noteholders of Renaissance Home Equity Loan
Trust 2005-4, Renaissance Home Equity Loan Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2005-4, Plaintiff,
against Albert Cherry, Machanda Dixon, et al., Defendants. |
Plaintiff's application, upon the default of all defendants, for an order of reference, for the
[*2]premises located at 3570 Canal Avenue, Brooklyn, New York
(Block 6978, Lot 20, County of Kings) is denied without prejudice. The "affidavit of merit"
submitted in support of this application for a default judgment is not by an officer of the plaintiff
or someone with a power of attorney from the plaintiff. Leave is granted to plaintiff,
BANK USA, N.A., AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED
NOTEHOLDERS OF RENAISSANCE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-4,
RENAISSANCE HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET-BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2005-4
(HSBC),
Further, according to plaintiff's application, the default of defendants Cherry and Dixon began with the nonpayment of principal and interest due on August 1, 2006. Yet, more than ten months later, plaintiff HSBC was willing to take an assignment of a nonperforming loan from Delta Funding Corporation. The Court wonders why HSBC would purchase a nonperforming loan, more than ten months in arrears? [*3]
Additionally, plaintiff HSBC must address a second matter if it renews its application for an order of reference upon compliance with CPLR § 3215 (f). In the instant action, as noted above, Scott Anderson, in his affidavit, executed on June 15, 2007, states he is Vice President of OCWEN. Yet, the June 13, 2007 assignment from MERS to HSBC is signed by the same Scott Anderson as Vice President of MERS. Did Mr. Anderson change his employer between June 13 2007 and June 15, 2007. The Court is concerned that there may be fraud on the part of HSBC, or at least malfeasance. Before granting an application for an order of reference, the Court requires an affidavit from Mr. Anderson describing his employment history for the past three years.
Lastly, the court notes that Scott Anderson, in the MERS to HSBC assignment gave his
address as Suite 100.
According to Exhibit 21.1 of the November 25, 2006 Goldman Sachs
10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission . . . is a
"significant subsidiary" of Goldman Sachs. . . . [T]he January 19, 2007
assignment has the same address for both the assignor Deutsche Bank
and the assignee MTGLQ Investors, L.P., at 1661 Worthington Road,
Suite 100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409. The Court will not
speculate about why two major financial behemoths, Deutsche Bank
and Goldman Sachs share space in a West Palm Beach, Florida office
suite.
In the instant action, with HSBC, OCWEN and MERS, joining with Deutsche Bank
and Goldman Sachs at Suite 100, the Court is now concerned as to why so many financial
goliaths are in the same space. The Court ponders if Suite 100 is the size of Madison Square
Garden to house all of these financial behemoths or if there is a more nefarious reason for this
corporate togetherness. If HSBC seeks to renew its application for an order to reference, the
Court needs to know, in the from of an affidavit, why Suite 100 is such a popular venue for these
corporations.
Real Property Actions
and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) § 1321 allows the Court in a foreclosure action, upon the
default of the defendant or defendant's admission of mortgage payment arrears, to appoint a
referee "to compute the amount due to the plaintiff." In the instant action, plaintiff's application
for an order of reference is a preliminary step to obtaining a default judgment of foreclosure and
sale. (Home Sav. Of Am., F.A. v Gkanios, 230 AD2d 770 [2d Dept 1996]).
shall file proof of service of the summons and the complaint, or
a summons and notice served pursuant to subdivision (b) of rule
305 or subdivision (a) of rule 316 of this chapter, and proof of [*4]
the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due
by affidavit made by the party . . . Where a verified complaint has
been served, it may be used as the affidavit of the facts constituting
the claim and the amount due; in such case, an affidavit as to the
default shall be made by the party or the party's attorney. [Emphasis
added].
Plaintiff has failed to submit "proof of the facts" in "an affidavit made by the
party." The "affidavit of merit" is submitted by Scott Anderson, "the Senior Vice President of
Residential Servicing for Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB, servicing agent of
Also, in the instant action, the complaint is unverified. In Blam v Netcher, 17
AD3d 495, 496 [2d Dept 2005], the Court reversed a default judgment granted in
Supreme Court, Nassau County, holding that:
In support of her motion for leave to enter judgment against
the defendant upon her default in answering, the plaintiff failed to
proffer either an affidavit of the facts or a complaint verified by a
party with personal knowledge of the facts (see CPLR 3215 (f):
Goodman v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. 2 AD3d 581
[2d Dept 2003]; Drake v Drake, 296 AD2d 566 [2d Dept 2002];
Parratta v McAllister, 283 AD2d 625 [2d Dept 2001]). Accordingly,
the plaintiff's motion should have been denied, with leave to renew
on proper papers (see Henriquez v Purins, 245 AD2d 337, 338
[2d Dept 1997]).
(See Hazim v Winter, 234 AD2d 422 [2d Dept 1996]; Finnegan v
Sheahan, 269 AD2d 491 [2d Dept 2000]; De Vivo v Spargo, 287 AD2d 535 [2d
Dept 2001]; Peniston v Epstein, 10
AD3d 450 [2d Dept 2004]; Taebong Choi v JKS Dry Cleaning Eqip. Corp., 15 AD3d 566 [2d
Dept 2005]; Matone v Sycamore Realty
Corp., 31 AD3d 721 [2d Dept 2006]; Crimmins v Sagona Landscaping, Ltd., 33 AD3d 580 [2d Dept
2006]).
Therefore, the instant application for an order of reference is denied without prejudice, with
leave to renew. The Court will grant plaintiff HSBC an order of reference when it: submits an
affidavit by either an officer of HSBC or someone with a valid power of attorney from HSBC,
possessing personal knowledge of the facts; presents an affidavit from Scott Anderson clarifying
his employment and what corporation he serves as an officer. Further, irrespective of his
employment history, Mr. Anderson must explain why HSBC would purchase a nonperforming
loan from Delta Funding Corporation, and why HSBC, OCWEN, MERS, Deutsche Bank and
[*5]Goldman Sachs all share office space in Suite 100.
ORDERED, that the application of plaintiff,
ORDERED, that leave is granted to plaintiff,
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
ENTER
___________________________
HON. ARTHUR M. SCHACK
J. S. C.